Results 321 to 330 of about 13,945,334 (387)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Patch testing with methyldibromoglutaronitrile
American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, 2000The combination of methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN) and phenoxyethanol (PE) is widely used as a preservative in body care products. Sensitization rates to MDBGN have increased parallel to its increasing use in cosmetics, skin care products, and moist toilet paper since the early 1990s, whereas PE is obviously not a sensitizer.
J, Geier+3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Patch Testing Methodology [PDF]
Jozef Jadassohn is the father of patch testing. At the time of his discovery in 1895, he was Professor of Dermatology at Breslau University (now Wroclaw in Poland). He initially reported a patient who had developed an eczematous reaction to mercury plasters.
Howard I. Maibach, Jean-Marie Lachapelle
openaire +1 more source
Contact Dermatitis, 1984
Colophony (rosin) has been fractionated into 2 parts, an acidic and a neutral fraction. Routine patch testing with neutral components gives positive reactions at a 40% higher frequency than routine patch testing with colophony (20%) (w/w in pet.). A concentration of 60% colophony is suggested for routine patch testing.
B. Gruvberger, S. Fregert
openaire +3 more sources
Colophony (rosin) has been fractionated into 2 parts, an acidic and a neutral fraction. Routine patch testing with neutral components gives positive reactions at a 40% higher frequency than routine patch testing with colophony (20%) (w/w in pet.). A concentration of 60% colophony is suggested for routine patch testing.
B. Gruvberger, S. Fregert
openaire +3 more sources
The reproducibility of patch tests
British Journal of Dermatology, 1999There is conflicting evidence regarding the reproducibility of patch testing. Discordant results have been reported in up to 44% of cases. The clinical relevance of these discordant patch tests has not been previously assessed. We studied 383 consecutive patients receiving simultaneous duplicate patch testing on opposite sides of the upper back with 10
A. Abdullah+4 more
openaire +3 more sources
Mesh‐distortion immunity assessment of QUAD8 elements by strong‐form patch tests
, 2006Strong-form patch tests are conducted to assess the mesh-distortion immunity of three types of 8-noded plane quadrilateral elements. Patches with various types of mesh-distortions are considered for the purpose.
S. Rajendran, E. Ooi, J. Yeo
semanticscholar +1 more source
The Journal of Pediatrics, 1949
Summary We tried to simulate the Vollmer patch test in the field of coccidioidomycosis with a patch test made with coccidioidin material. Out of 120 subjects tested with the filter paper method similar to that of Vollmer's, twenty-seven positive patch tests were noted, or 22.5 per cent. With the ointment method, four positive patches out of 100 known
Robert M. Cohen, Myrnie A. Gifford
openaire +3 more sources
Summary We tried to simulate the Vollmer patch test in the field of coccidioidomycosis with a patch test made with coccidioidin material. Out of 120 subjects tested with the filter paper method similar to that of Vollmer's, twenty-seven positive patch tests were noted, or 22.5 per cent. With the ointment method, four positive patches out of 100 known
Robert M. Cohen, Myrnie A. Gifford
openaire +3 more sources
Patch testing—a recapitulation
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1981Although patch testing continues to be one of the most useful office tools of the inquiring dermatologist, the procedure is not used as often as patients deserve. This article reviews the use of the patch test and emphasizes its utility in the practice of dermatology.
openaire +2 more sources
Contact Dermatitis, 1985
Routine path testing with a series of 6 industrial biocides containing methylene‐bis‐thiocyanate (Cytoc 3522®), benzosothizolin‐3‐one (BIT), chlorocresol (Preventol CMK®), 2‐n‐octyl‐4‐isothiazolin‐3‐one (Kathon 863®), polyhdroxymethylene monobenzylether (Preventol D2®) or 1,3,5‐tris (hydroxy‐ethyl) hexahydrotrizine (Grotan BK®) was carried out in 6 ...
Klaus Ejner Andersen, Niels K. Veien
openaire +3 more sources
Routine path testing with a series of 6 industrial biocides containing methylene‐bis‐thiocyanate (Cytoc 3522®), benzosothizolin‐3‐one (BIT), chlorocresol (Preventol CMK®), 2‐n‐octyl‐4‐isothiazolin‐3‐one (Kathon 863®), polyhdroxymethylene monobenzylether (Preventol D2®) or 1,3,5‐tris (hydroxy‐ethyl) hexahydrotrizine (Grotan BK®) was carried out in 6 ...
Klaus Ejner Andersen, Niels K. Veien
openaire +3 more sources
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 2018
Dermatitis is one of the most common illnesses encountered by healthcare providers and the causes are numerous. Contact dermatitis is the form of dermatitis resulting from contact with the environment, and it may be either irritant or allergic in nature.
Betty A. Uyesugi+2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Dermatitis is one of the most common illnesses encountered by healthcare providers and the causes are numerous. Contact dermatitis is the form of dermatitis resulting from contact with the environment, and it may be either irritant or allergic in nature.
Betty A. Uyesugi+2 more
openaire +3 more sources
, 1937
This paper presents a compilation of the results of patch tests made on 998 persons, who were subjected to a total of 10,198 patch tests with about 500 different substances.
A. Rostenberg, M. B. Sulzberger
semanticscholar +1 more source
This paper presents a compilation of the results of patch tests made on 998 persons, who were subjected to a total of 10,198 patch tests with about 500 different substances.
A. Rostenberg, M. B. Sulzberger
semanticscholar +1 more source