Results 301 to 310 of about 380,793 (333)
Do elementary statistics or equilibrium theory deliver any insight regarding how we should argue in debates? We provide an answer in a model in which each discussant wants to convince the audience that a specific state holds. If the discussants' payoffs in the audience's posterior are concave above and convex below the prior and exhibit loss aversion ...
Chen, Ying, Olszewski, Wojciech
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
The persuasiveness of persuasive discourse
International Journal of Educational Research, 2001Abstract This investigation explored why and how persuasion occurs. Toward this end, we examined the processing of two articles under conditions called for in the persuasion and conceptual change literatures. One unique aspect of the current study was the use of topic-specific measures of beliefs, knowledge (i.e., perceived and demonstrated), and ...
Patricia A. Alexander+2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Conformity, Persuasibility and Counternormative Persuasion
Sociometry, 1967The relationship between conformity to social norms, persuasibility and counternormative persuasion was studied among residents of a home for aged. In general the residents were highly persuasible and some were clearly more persuasible than others. However, no relationship was found between the tendency to agree with the interviewers and conformity to ...
Lucille Nahemow, Ruth Bennett
openaire +3 more sources
Bullshitting and persuasion: The persuasiveness of a disregard for the truth
British Journal of Social Psychology, 2021Although generally viewed as a common and undesirable social behaviour, very little is known about the nature of bullshitting (i.e., communicating with little to no regard for evidence or truth; Raritan Q Rev 6, 1986, 81); its consequences; and its potential communicative utility.
openaire +3 more sources