Results 171 to 180 of about 2,318 (199)

Morphology of the Mouthparts of Several Species of Phytophagous Mites

Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1976
The morphology of the mouthparts of 5 families of phytophagous mites was studied. In tetranychid mites the stylets, or movable digits of the chelicerae, are concave mesally, forming a duct. A tiny dark line extending along the medial surface of one of the stylets may represent a groove which “hooks in” the opposing stylet when both are protracted.
R. G. Hislop, L. R. Jeppson
openaire   +1 more source

Plant Responses to Phytophagous Mites/Thrips and Search for Resistance

, 2019
This eBook is a collection of articles from a Frontiers Research Topic. Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers Journals Series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject.
openaire   +2 more sources

Interactions among phytophagous mites, and introduced and naturally occurring predatory mites, on strawberry in the UK

Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2007
In choice test experiments on strawberry leaf disc arenas the phytoseiid mites Neoseiulus californicus and N. cucumeris were more effective than Typhlodromus pyri as predators of the phytophagous mites Tetranychus urticae and Phytonemus pallidus. There were no preferences shown for either prey by any of these predators.
Jean, Fitzgerald, Nicola, Pepper, Mike, Easterbrook, Tom, Pope, Mike, Solomon   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Biocontrol of phytophagous mites in Quebec apple orchards

2010
During the 1980s biocontrol of phytophagous mites was based on the mass rearing and inundative releases of predators in orchards. This approach was found to be unreliable and impractical on a large scale. Since 1990 a highly robust grower-friendly philosophy for biocontrol of phytophagous mites in orchards has been initiated, based on the conservation,
Noubar J. Bostanian, Gaétan Racette, Jacques Lasnier   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Phytophagous mites and their predators in New Zealand orchards

New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 1964
Abstract Panonychus ulmi (Koch), the most important phytophagous mite on apple, plum, and peach trees, had five and sometimes six generations in a year; summer eggs were laid from mid‐October until mid‐April, and winter eggs from mid‐January until late May.
openaire   +1 more source

Effect of the Tested Compounds on the Population of the Phytophagous Mites on Brinjal

Planta Animalia
This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of various chemical and biological compounds on phytophagous mites and their associated natural enemies, including predatory insects, mites, and true spiders, in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) cultivation.
Muhammad Amjad Bashir, Jam Nazir Ahmad, Nasir Mahmood, Sagheer Atta, Munaza Batool, Sanober Gull   +5 more
openaire   +1 more source

Phytophagous Mites

1966
STANLEY W. JACKLIN, FLOYD F. SMITH
openaire   +1 more source

Notes on Phytophagous and Predatory Mites of Arizona1

Journal of Economic Entomology, 1959
F. F. Bibby, D. M. Tuttle
openaire   +1 more source

Fungicide reduction favors the control of phytophagous mites under both organic and conventional viticulture

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2021
Jo Marie Reiff, Christoph Hoffmann, Martin H Entling   +2 more
exaly  

Feeding Phytophagous Mites on Liquid Formulations12

Journal of Economic Entomology, 1970
Makram A. Hanna, Edwin T. Hibbs
openaire   +1 more source