A Comparison of Defense and Plaintiff Expert Witnesses in Orthopaedic Surgery Malpractice Litigation
Background: According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Standards of Professionalism, the responsible testimony of expert witnesses in orthopaedic surgery malpractice lawsuits is important to the public interest.
Howard Park +2 more
exaly +4 more sources
Jurymen Seldom Rule Against a Person That They Like: The Relationship Between Emotions Towards a Defendant, the Understanding of Case Facts, and Juror Judgments in Civil Trials [PDF]
Legal actors often discuss emotion-based decisions and reasoned evaluation of the facts as distinct and opposite methods through which jurors can reach conclusions. However, research suggests that emotion can have an indirect effect on juror decisions by
Hannah J. Phalen +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Diverging Decisions? A Comparison of Jury Verdict Procedures [PDF]
Courts have the capacity to structure juries’ decision making through the use of general verdicts with answers to written questions, special verdicts, and, in some countries, the requirement that juries provide reasons for their verdicts.
Kayla A. Burd +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
The impact of patent infringement litigation decisions on firms’ innovation performance in China [PDF]
The judiciary protects the value of innovation through remedies such as injunctions and damages when patent rights are infringed, adjusting the expected returns on future innovation activities for firms. Based on data from 1,062 Chinese firms involved in
Yuting Deng, Yong Qi, Qing Guo
doaj +2 more sources
Subdural hematomas and medical malpractice in the USA: an analysis of 314 patients [PDF]
Introduction Subdural hematomas (SDHs) are a serious condition that can lead to high rates of morbidity and mortality. Given the prevalence of malpractice in healthcare, particularly among physicians who treat patients with high-risk conditions, the aim ...
Isabella L Pecorari +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Basics of evaluating the role of the judge in proving civil litigation [PDF]
In Islamic jurisprudence, jurists have provided criteria and cited various legal rules and principles in order to determine the applicant. The reason for the jurists for this distinction is that they can determine the burden of proving the dispute to the
shole hashemi +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Investigation of the Liability for the Claimant in Relation to the Damages of the Litigant as a Result of the Garnishment and the Temporary Order [PDF]
The Code of Civil Procedure In Article 120 has announced: the plaintiff is liable for damages to the litigant as a result of garnishment in the event of a final judgment against him, and in Article 323, the liability of the applicant for an interim ...
Mahdi Hasanzadeh
doaj +1 more source
Civil liability and environmental protection: Italian-French looks
With the growing awareness of environmental protection issues in contemporary societies and the increasing number and seriousness of environmental violations, civil liability emerged as one of the legal tools to be mobilized in particular in Italy and ...
Jeremy Antippas
doaj +1 more source
Arguments for reform of the dynamic of medical negligence litigation in Ireland frequently centre on temporal and financial concerns. However, as the field of law and psychology has continued to grow, a body of international literature has emerged which ...
M. Tumelty
semanticscholar +1 more source
Before the judgement in De Klerk v Minister of Police 2020 1 SACR 1 (CC), (de Klerk), a plaintiff could claim damages for unlawful arrest and detention after the first appearance in court if the arresting (or the investigating) officer had conducted ...
Phindile Raymond Msaule
doaj +1 more source

