Results 71 to 80 of about 37,580 (105)

NEGLIGENCE-DUTY OF CARE-DETERMINATION OF PLAINTIFF\u27S STATUS UNDER GUEST STATUTE [PDF]

, 1953
Plaintiff, a boy scout, was assisting in a paper collection for the benefit of his troop, and while so doing, was injured when he attempted to regain his position on a utility trailer attached to the assistant scoutmaster\u27s automobile.
Wilkinson, Jr., Donald M.
core   +1 more source

FEDERAL PROCEDURE-CHANGE OF VENUE ON MOTION OF THE PLAINTIFF [PDF]

, 1951
Plaintiff, a resident of California, was injured on defendant corporation\u27s premises in Nevada. Being unable to serve defendant in California, plaintiff started a negligence action in the Federal District Court in Nevada and then moved for a change of
Ulmer, David F., S. Ed.
core  

Justifying the plaintiff\u27s receipt of punitive damages

, 2005
This thesis addresses the punitive damages reform issue of whether or not the plaintiff should receive the award. Reformers argue the purposes of punitive damages would be better served with other distribution options; and prioritized societal gains ...
Moschella, Marlisa
core   +1 more source

Answers to Defendant State of Ohio\u27s First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff [PDF]

, 1999
The State of Ohio\u27s first round of discovery questions asked to the Plaintiff and the answers provided to those questions.
Gilbert, Terry H., Carr, George H.
core  

In Supreme Court, August term, 1923, no. 69, Jewett & Sherman Company, a corporation, plaintiff and respondent vs. Rosenberg Brothers & Company, a corporation, defendant and appellant brief of plaintiff and respondant /

, 1923
Action by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant certain amounts paid for honey, from Arizona, alleged to have been of inferior quality and grade.
Charles C. Miller Memorial Apicultural Library. WU, Wisconsin. Supreme Court., Jewett and Sherman Company (Milwaukee, Wis.), plaintiff., Rosenberg Bros. and Company (San Francisco, Calif.), defendant.   +3 more
core  

Practice and Procedures - costs - offer to settle by plaintiff under UCPR r360 for amount of claim plus costs

, 2002
In JLG Industries Inc v Teetree Pty Ltd [2002] QDC 031 the court considered the implications in terms of costs of an offer to settle by the plaintiff under the UCPR where the element of compromise involved only acceptance of the amount of claim without ...
Jackson, Sheryl
core  

CIVIL PRACTICE Civil Actions; Arguments of Counsel: Provide the Plaintiff is Entitled to Opening and Concluding Arguments Except When Defendant Introduces No Evidence or Admits a Prima Facie Case; Provide that in Civil Actions for Personal Injuries, Defendant Does Not Admit a Prima Facie Case if Defendant Introduces Evidence as to Extent of Damages, Other than Cross-Examination of Plaintiff or Plaintiff\u27s Witness [PDF]

, 2012
The Act provides that in civil actions when the burden of proof rests on the plaintiff, the plaintiff shall be entitled to make the opening and concluding arguments.
Georgia State University Law Review
core  

Federal Venue and the Corporate Plaintiff [PDF]

, 1962
STUDENT SYMPOSIUM ON JURISDICTION AND VENUE: The place of trial of an action has great significance at all stages of litigation, from service of process through execution of the judgment.

core   +1 more source

Plaintiff\u27s Witnesses

, 1915
The Plaintiff\u27s Witness list in the Robert S. Frasure Murder trial.
Carter County (Ky.) Circuit Court
core  

Marvin A. Dalton Jr Plaintiff/Petitioner vs. Brian G. Herold, Defendant/Respondent : Reply Brief [PDF]

, 1995
IN THE UTAH SUPREME COURT MARVIN A. DALTON, JR., Plaintiff/Petitioner, vs. BRIAN G. HEROLD, Defendant/Respondent. ] ) Case No. 950414 ) Court of Appeals ) No. 941070-CA ) Third District Court \u3e No.
Utah Court of Appeals
core