Results 191 to 200 of about 31,329 (239)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Defeating Naturalism: Defending and Reformulating Plantinga's EAAN
Eleutheria, 2015: During the past two decades, Alvin Plantinga has formulated an argument against naturalism that focuses on naturalism’s acceptance of contemporary evolutionary theory.
T. McNabb
semanticscholar +1 more source
2007
Few thinkers have had as much impact on contemporary philosophy as has Alvin Plantinga. The work of this quintessential analytic philosopher has in many respects set the tone for the debate in the fields of modal metaphysics and epistemology and he is arguably the most important philosopher of religion of our time.
openaire +1 more source
Few thinkers have had as much impact on contemporary philosophy as has Alvin Plantinga. The work of this quintessential analytic philosopher has in many respects set the tone for the debate in the fields of modal metaphysics and epistemology and he is arguably the most important philosopher of religion of our time.
openaire +1 more source
Noûs, 1998
Theists believe that God exists and is justified in permitting El and E2. Since evil is intrinsically bad, what justifies God in permitting El and E2 is something else. To simplify matters we will suppose here that the something else is a good state of affairs (perhaps a conjunctive state of affairs) that God brings about and could bring about only by ...
openaire +1 more source
Theists believe that God exists and is justified in permitting El and E2. Since evil is intrinsically bad, what justifies God in permitting El and E2 is something else. To simplify matters we will suppose here that the something else is a good state of affairs (perhaps a conjunctive state of affairs) that God brings about and could bring about only by ...
openaire +1 more source
Interpreting the probabilities in Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2021G. Neels
semanticscholar +1 more source
Plantinga's Defence of Serious Actualism
Analysis, 1989IN a series of papers ([2], [3], [4]) Alvin Plantinga has argued for serious actualism, the thesis that necessarily everything is such that necessarily if it has a property, then it exists. In this paper I argue that Plantinga's latest argument for serious actualism is flawed in two respects.
openaire +1 more source
Plantinga Redux: Is the Scientific Realist Committed to the Rejection of Naturalism?
Sophia, 2019A. Graber, Luke Golemon
semanticscholar +1 more source
Why so negative about negative theology? The search for a plantinga-proof apophaticism
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2014Samuel Lebens
semanticscholar +2 more sources