Results 71 to 80 of about 1,125,539 (146)
Controvérsias científicas como controvérsias editoriais
Neste artigo, defendemos que editores de revistas científicas são fundamentais no processo dedefinição de controvérsias, intervindo no fluxo do debate e proporcionando condiçõesfavoráveis para uma das posições.
Pinheiro, Joaquim +1 more
core +1 more source
Scientific Publishing in the era of Artificial Intelligence: Integrity and Responsibility. [PDF]
Oliveira MM, Oliveira GMM.
europepmc +1 more source
Manifesto by the editors of Brazilian scientific journals in the field of human aging in support of open access to research and publications. [PDF]
Wachholz PA +18 more
europepmc +1 more source
The scientific journal, beyond experts: the communication strategies of The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet. [PDF]
Barata G, Medeiros CF.
europepmc +1 more source
Between continuities and innovations: what CSP has in store for 2026. [PDF]
Alves LC, Carvalho MS, Lima LD.
europepmc +1 more source
Editorials: voices of a scientific journal. [PDF]
Alves LC, Lima LD, Carvalho MS.
europepmc +1 more source
Diversity in scientific publishing is a strategic contribution to plural science. [PDF]
Lima LD, Deslandes S.
europepmc +1 more source
[Eugenics in the Luso-Brazilian axis: correspondence between Renato Kehl and Mendes Correia]. [PDF]
Giesbrecht DF.
europepmc +1 more source

