Results 201 to 210 of about 7,555 (306)

Reliability and Validity of Risk Assessment Tools for Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review. [PDF]

open access: yesCampbell Syst Rev
Brouillette-Alarie S   +11 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Tackling hate speech in schools – A systematic review of programme quality from a scientific and school practice perspective

open access: yesReview of Education, Volume 14, Issue 2, August 2026.
Abstract Hate speech is a global issue. Intentional expressions of group‐related derogation have become more widespread in recent years and they potentially bear negative consequences for individuals, communities and societies. After the internet, the school is a context where children and adolescents perpetrate and/or witness hate speech or become ...
Julia Kansok‐Dusche   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

From Friends to Foes? Negative Campaign Tactics on Facebook and Their Effects on User Engagement Across Three National Elections in Sweden (2014–2022)

open access: yesScandinavian Political Studies, Volume 49, Issue 3, August 2026.
ABSTRACT Research has documented an increase in the use of negative campaign strategies during election campaigns worldwide. This study contributes to the literature by offering a longitudinal analysis of how negative statements and moral scandalization strategies by Swedish political parties on Facebook have evolved over time, and whether they ...
Andreas Widholm   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

The Red‐Blue Heuristics: How Citizens Manage Institutionalized Coalition Politics

open access: yesScandinavian Political Studies, Volume 49, Issue 3, August 2026.
ABSTRACT Coalition politics represents a challenge to democratic citizens: they need to consider which governing coalitions a party is willing to enter or support in order to make informed vote choices. Following a minimalist perspective, several scholars have suggested that citizens rely on universal heuristics, such as left‐right placement, when ...
Ida B. Hjermitslev   +1 more
wiley   +1 more source

Claiming and Blaming: How Minority Party Status Shapes Filibuster Framing in the U.S. Senate

open access: yesLegislative Studies Quarterly, Volume 51, Issue 3, August 2026.
ABSTRACT Why do senators choose to talk about filibustering, a tool widely associated with obstruction and gridlock? This paper examines how senators strategically reference filibustering in official communications, focusing on two rhetorical frames: credit claiming and blaming.
Jessie E. Munson
wiley   +1 more source

Building resilience against violent extremism digitally: trialing a new gender-based approach among gamers. [PDF]

open access: yesFront Psychol
Lamphere-Englund G   +7 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy