Results 161 to 170 of about 3,356 (185)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2007
Published as part of Yoshimura, M. & Fisher, B. L., 2007, A revision of male ants of the Malagasy region (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Key to subfamilies and treatment of the genera of Ponerinae., pp.
Yoshimura, M., Fisher, B. L.
openaire +1 more source
Published as part of Yoshimura, M. & Fisher, B. L., 2007, A revision of male ants of the Malagasy region (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Key to subfamilies and treatment of the genera of Ponerinae., pp.
Yoshimura, M., Fisher, B. L.
openaire +1 more source
2014
Published as part of Schmidt, C. A. & Shattuck, S. O., 2014, The Higher Classification of the Ant Subfamily Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a Review of Ponerine Ecology and Behavior, pp.
Schmidt, C. A., Shattuck, S. O.
openaire +1 more source
Published as part of Schmidt, C. A. & Shattuck, S. O., 2014, The Higher Classification of the Ant Subfamily Ponerinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a Review of Ponerine Ecology and Behavior, pp.
Schmidt, C. A., Shattuck, S. O.
openaire +1 more source
Abdominaldrüsen beiPachycondyla Tridentata (Smith): Formicidae, Ponerinae
Insectes Sociaux, 1983Die grose PonerinePachycondyla tridentata verfugt uber 28 abdominale Hautdrusen, einschlieslich der Gift- und der Dufourdruse. Das ist das Maximum an Abdominaldrusen, das bisher bei Ameisen und auch bei anderen Hymenopteren gefunden wurde. Die Dufourdruse ist dagegen bis auf wenige Zellen im Aculeus atrophiert.
Karla Jessen, Ulrich Maschwitz
openaire +1 more source
2015
Ponerinae incertae sedis There are 2 more specimens (PIN 3429/112 and 1168) which belong to Ponerinae but cannot be described formally because of imperfect preservation state. These unquestionably represent 2 species distinct from each other as well as from all Ponerinae described above.
Dlussky, G. M. +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Ponerinae incertae sedis There are 2 more specimens (PIN 3429/112 and 1168) which belong to Ponerinae but cannot be described formally because of imperfect preservation state. These unquestionably represent 2 species distinct from each other as well as from all Ponerinae described above.
Dlussky, G. M. +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 2023
Mitochondrial DNA is a valuable tool for population genetics and evolutionary studies in a wide range of organisms. With advancements in sequencing techniques, it's now possible to gain deeper insights into this molecule. By understanding how many genes there are, how they're organized within the molecule, identifying the presence of spacers, and ...
Maria Paula Villas-Bôas Tourinho Vidal +7 more
openaire +2 more sources
Mitochondrial DNA is a valuable tool for population genetics and evolutionary studies in a wide range of organisms. With advancements in sequencing techniques, it's now possible to gain deeper insights into this molecule. By understanding how many genes there are, how they're organized within the molecule, identifying the presence of spacers, and ...
Maria Paula Villas-Bôas Tourinho Vidal +7 more
openaire +2 more sources
Ponerinae Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau
2014Subfamily Ponerinae Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau Ponérites Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835: 185 (as group name). Type genus: Ponera Latreille, 1804: 179. Dalla Torre, 1893: 13 (Ponerinae). Ponerinae is the largest ant subfamily outside the formicoid clade, and is rivaled or exceeded in diversity only by Dolichoderinae, Formicinae and Myrmicinae within
Schmidt, C. A., Shattuck, S. O.
openaire +1 more source
2013
Monophyly of Ponerinae and its tribes and genera The monophyly of Ponerinae was strongly supported by analyses of the ALL_DATA matrix (BPP = 1.00, BS = 0.98; Fig. 3), confirming the results of previous molecular phylogenetic studies with more limited sampling of ponerine taxa (e.g., Moreau et al., 2006; Brady et al., 2006) and confirming predictions ...
openaire +1 more source
Monophyly of Ponerinae and its tribes and genera The monophyly of Ponerinae was strongly supported by analyses of the ALL_DATA matrix (BPP = 1.00, BS = 0.98; Fig. 3), confirming the results of previous molecular phylogenetic studies with more limited sampling of ponerine taxa (e.g., Moreau et al., 2006; Brady et al., 2006) and confirming predictions ...
openaire +1 more source
Division of labor inPonera pennsylvannica (Formicidae: Ponerinae)
Insectes Sociaux, 1994We examined division of labor and colony demography in the antPonera pennsylvannica. Observation of three colonies with individually marked workers revealed a high degree of interindividual behavioral variation and a rough but consistent division of labor between brood tenders and foragers. This division was present both in colonies consisting entirely
S. C. Pratt, N. F. Carlin, P. Calabi
openaire +1 more source
1922
Ponerinae Postpetiole separated from the third abdominal segment by a constriction which is more or less marked (except in the Odontomachini and in certain males of Ponerini), almost always as broad as the third segment (except in Myrmecia and a few others). Worker and female with a powerful sting. As a rule there is a stridulating organ on the basal
openaire +1 more source
Ponerinae Postpetiole separated from the third abdominal segment by a constriction which is more or less marked (except in the Odontomachini and in certain males of Ponerini), almost always as broad as the third segment (except in Myrmecia and a few others). Worker and female with a powerful sting. As a rule there is a stridulating organ on the basal
openaire +1 more source
La prédation chezOdontomachus troglodytes Santschi (Formicidae-Ponerinae)
Insectes Sociaux, 1985Des ouvrieres d'Odontomachus troglodytes sont placees devant quatre types de proies: 1) de taille «normale»: ouvriers d'Allognathotermes, larves deTenebrio molitor de 5 a 6 mm de long; 2) inertes: ouvriers d'Allognathotermes, anesthesies au CO2; 3) de petite taille: ouvriers deMicrotermes; 4) de grande taille: larves deTenebrio molitor de 10 a 11 mm de
A. Dejean, E. P. Bashingwa
openaire +1 more source