Results 351 to 360 of about 444,144 (378)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2021
If pragmatics is the study of human communication (with a specific focus on verbal language) in context, cognitive pragmatics can be defined as the study of the psychological processes and states involved in that activity. As a matter of fact, however, its focus is almost exclusively on language understanding, while very little attention has been paid ...
openaire +3 more sources
If pragmatics is the study of human communication (with a specific focus on verbal language) in context, cognitive pragmatics can be defined as the study of the psychological processes and states involved in that activity. As a matter of fact, however, its focus is almost exclusively on language understanding, while very little attention has been paid ...
openaire +3 more sources
Pragmatics and Pragmatic Considerations in Explanation
Contemporary Pragmatism, 2009I provide a brief history of pragmatics as it relates to explanation, highlighting the great neglect of pragmatics and pragmatic considerations in regard to explanation during the mid-twentieth century. In order to understand pragmatic considerations regarding explanation, I utilize the work of Bas C. van Fraassen, Peter Achinstein, and Jan Faye. These
openaire +2 more sources
Semantics, pragmatics, and Critical Pragmatics
2011Introduction In the second half of the twentieth century, two important developments in the investigation of the meaning and use of natural language pushed the concept of what is said to center stage. Kaplan, Kripke, Donnellan, and others developed a theory of reference and truth for semantics that broke with the Frege–Russell descriptivist ...
Kepa Korta, John Perry
openaire +2 more sources
For a Pragmatics of the Useless
For a Pragmatics of the Useless, 2020E. Manning
semanticscholar +1 more source
On Historical Pragmatics and Peircean Pragmatism
Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 2008Historical pragmatics constitutes both the subject matter and methodology. In this paper, the scientific methodology of historical pragmatics is discussed and related to the opinions shared by some 19th-century linguists and philosophers. In particular, Charles S.
openaire +2 more sources
2015
In a classical theory of denial to deny A is equivalent to asserting ¬A. Glut theorists reject the right-to-left direction of the Classical denial: asserting ¬A must not commit one to denying A, i.e. denial must not be reducible to the assertion of ¬A. In particular, the paraconsistent denial of A is stronger than the assertion of ¬A.
CARRARA, MASSIMILIANO +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
In a classical theory of denial to deny A is equivalent to asserting ¬A. Glut theorists reject the right-to-left direction of the Classical denial: asserting ¬A must not commit one to denying A, i.e. denial must not be reducible to the assertion of ¬A. In particular, the paraconsistent denial of A is stronger than the assertion of ¬A.
CARRARA, MASSIMILIANO +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure
, 1996P. A. Brandt
semanticscholar +1 more source