Results 251 to 260 of about 3,770 (279)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
On the lattice structure of preclusive rough sets
2004 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37542), 2005Once defined a rough approximation map on the abstract notion of minimal BZ lattice, the collection of all rough approximations is took into account and its structure is analyzed with respect to lattice properties. Further, some nonstandard complementations are introduced on it.
CATTANEO, GIANPIERO, CIUCCI, DAVIDE ELIO
openaire +2 more sources
Strong Matching Preclusion of Arrangement Graphs
Journal of Interconnection Networks, 2016The strong matching preclusion number of a graph is the minimum number of vertices and edges whose deletion results in a graph with neither perfect matchings nor almost-perfect matchings. This is an extension of the matching preclusion problem that was introduced by Park and Ihm.
Eddie Cheng 0001, Omer Siddiqui
openaire +2 more sources
Preclusion of Sociological Policing
2013A <i>Terry</i> interaction between a police officer and a person is fact specific, based on the “totality of the circumstances.” Motions to suppress are won and lost entirely on the facts. That judicial circumstance encourages police officers to testify about selected facts, slanted facts, and imaginary facts which justify their official ...
openaire +1 more source
Matching Preclusion and Conditional Matching Preclusion of Exchanged Crossed Cube
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022Bo Zhu, Shumin Zhang, Chengfu Ye
openaire +1 more source
With contributions from some of the leading scholars in law and economics, this comprehensive book summarizes the state of economic research on litigation, procedure and evidence.
openaire +1 more source
openaire +1 more source
Texas A&M Law Review
For nearly two centuries, American courts recited that the preclusive effects of a court’s final judgment were subject to a requirement of “mutuality,” meaning that a party in Lawsuit 2 who would not be bound by a judgment from a prior Lawsuit 1 could not benefit in Lawsuit 2 from the first lawsuit’s judgment either.
openaire +1 more source
For nearly two centuries, American courts recited that the preclusive effects of a court’s final judgment were subject to a requirement of “mutuality,” meaning that a party in Lawsuit 2 who would not be bound by a judgment from a prior Lawsuit 1 could not benefit in Lawsuit 2 from the first lawsuit’s judgment either.
openaire +1 more source
Conditional Fractional Matching Preclusion of n-Dimensional Torus Networks
Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2021Jixiang Meng, Yingzhi Tian, Weihua Yang
exaly