Results 31 to 40 of about 196,964 (344)
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2020 Background Preprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles.
Clarissa F. D. Carneiro +20 more
doaj +2 more sources
Korean editors’ and researchers’ experiences with preprints and attitudes towards preprint policies [PDF]
Science Editing, 2021 Purpose This study investigated editors’ and researcher’s experiences with preprints and their attitudes towards preprint policies in Korea. Methods From December 30, 2019 to January 10, 2020, a Google Forms survey was mailed to members of the Korean ...
Hyun Jung Yi, Sun Huh
doaj +1 more source
Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news. [PDF]
Public Underst SciNews reporting of preprints became commonplace during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet the extent to which the public understands what preprints are is unclear.
Fleerackers A +4 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Characterization of Comments About bioRxiv and medRxiv Preprints
JAMA Network Open, 2023 Key Points Question What is the content of the comments posted on the bioRxiv and medRxiv preprint platforms? Findings In this cross-sectional study, 7.3% of preprints from 2020 had received at least 1 comment (mean follow-up of 7.5 months), with a ...
C. F. D. Carneiro +10 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations. [PDF]
PLoS OneCalls to make scientific research more open have gained traction with a range of societal stakeholders. Open Science practices include but are not limited to the early sharing of results via preprints and openly sharing outputs such as data and code to ...
Colavizza G +6 more
europepmc +3 more sources
“Tortured phrases” in preprints
Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2023 This commentary takes note of the existence of “tortured phrases” (i.e. unspecific jargon or confusing alternative phrases), as indexed in the Tortured Phrases Detector of the Problematic Paper Screener (PPS) (sourced on January 10, 2023) in 213 ...
J. A. Teixeira da Silva
semanticscholar +1 more source
Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, 2023 Since 1991, preprints have increasingly been distributed over the Internet, as opposed to paper copies. Preprints date back to at least the early 1960s, when the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States began circulating preprints in the
Maryory Astrid Gómez-Botero
doaj +1 more source
To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023 Open science is receiving widespread attention globally, and preprinting offers an important way to implement open science practices in scholarly publishing. To develop a systematic understanding of researchers’ adoption of and attitudes toward preprinting, we conducted a survey of authors of research papers published in 2021 and early 2022. Our survey
Rong Ni, Ludo Waltman
openaire +1 more source
Adherence to preprints’ publication in Dentistry by Brazilian researchers
Data and Metadata, 2023 Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the adherence to the preprint publication format by a sample of Brazilian researchers. Methods: Searches were carried out, in September 2021, on the MedArxiv, OSF, and SciELO preprints platforms, looking ...
Jaisson Cenci +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online [PDF]
arXiv.org, 2022 Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process.
Charvi Rastogi +6 more
semanticscholar +1 more source