Results 21 to 30 of about 2,820 (216)

‘In Contemplation only’: Revisiting the Debate between the Chalcedonians and Anti‐Chalcedonians on the Reality of the Natures of Christ

Modern Theology, Volume 39, Issue 3, Page 490-507, July 2023., 2023
Abstract Although a theological exchange of ideas between Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Christians flourished at the end of the twentieth century, the ecumenical achievements of these discussions have been met with notable objections and critiques by theologians.
Sebastian Mateiescu
wiley   +1 more source

Substantia stans per essentiam suam: Proclus et l’ auteur du De causis sur les êtres qui se constituent eux-mêmes

Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, Volume 3, 2022
Pour examiner comment l’auteur du De causis a interprété et transformé l’Elementatio theologica de Proclus, j’ ai choisi ce qui est considéré comme la doctrine la plus originale de sa métaphysique, celle qui concerne les êtres qui se constituent eux ...
C. Steel
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The problem of (in)divisible intellect in Proclus’ Elements of theology 180

Études Platoniciennes, 2022
Does Proclus’ transcendent intellect have parts? Modern editors of the Elements of Theology disagree on a crucial proposition where Proclus reveals the mereological nature of intellect. In his seminal critical edition, E.R.
Arthur Oosthout
doaj   +1 more source

THE ACHILLES OF PROCLUS

Classical Quarterly, 2022
In Essay Six of his Commentary on Plato's Republic, the Platonist Proclus offers a defence of the poetry of Homer and attempts to harmonize the Homeric epics, as inspired texts, with the philosophy of Plato as he interprets it.
G. Miles
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Proclus

Ancient Philosophy, 2012
In the history of a specific idea there are moments of reception that radically alter a concept’s functioning, moments where its meaning is transplanted in such a way that an internal rupture emerges. In the case of imagination the Neoplatonist Proclus (410/412-485) seems responsible for such a disruptive reception.
openaire   +3 more sources

Pourquoi et comment Proclus commentait-il Euclide ?

Cahiers François Viète, 2003
In this article I focus on Proclus of Lycia’s Commentary on the first book of Euclid’s Elements. I propose an interpretation that takes into account the context in which it was written and that I introduce in two steps.
Alain Bernard
doaj   +1 more source

Proclus’ Reception in Maximus the Confessor, Mediated through John Philoponus and Dionysius the Ps.-Areopagite: A Case Study of Ambiguum 7

Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, Volume 3, 2022
The early Byzantine Church Father, St. Maximus the Confessor (~580– 662a.d.), has finally begun to receive the attention that is due him in scholarship on the history of philosophy,1 yet much work still remains. Maximus is most well-known for his defense
J. Greig
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Hymny Proklosa: filozofia i kult

Vox Patrum, 2013
The present paper consists of the introduction to the Neoplatonic and Chaldean systems, the first Polish translation of seven extant Hymns by Proclus (AD 412- 485), and the commentaries on each of them.
Ewa Osek
doaj   +1 more source

The metaphysical “monistic” approach of the Platonic Timaeus by the Neo-Platonist Proclus

Revista de Filosofia Antiga, 2020
In this article, we focus on Proclus' commentary on Plato's Timaeus (30a3-6) about how the divine Demiurge intervenes in matter. It is an interesting extract due to the fact that Proclus manages to combine philosophical perspective with theological ...
Christos Terezis, Lydia Petridou
doaj   +1 more source

THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF ELIZABETH ANSCOMBE edited by Roger Teichmann, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022, pp. 520, £ 97.00, hbk

, 2023
New Blackfriars, Volume 104, Issue 1111, Page 373-376, May 2023.
FERGUS KERR OP
wiley   +1 more source