Results 171 to 180 of about 1,129,395 (186)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Comparative analysis of torque and apical force to assess the cutting behaviour of ProTaper Next and ProTaper Universal endodontic instruments

Australian Endodontic Journal, 2019
AbstractThis study assessed the cutting properties of two Nickel Titanium file systems with different designs and manufacturing materials. ProTaper Next X1 and X2 (PTN; Dentsply Sirona) and ProTaper Universal S2 and F1 (PTU; Dentsply Sirona) instruments were employed.
Gustavo de Cristofaro Almeida   +6 more
openaire   +2 more sources

In Vitro Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of ProTaper Next, HyFlex CM, OneShape, and ProTaper Universal Instruments in a Canal with a Double Curvature

Journal of Endodontics, 2016
The aim of this study was to compare the resistance to cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Next X2 (PTN X2; size 25, 0.06 taper), Hyflex CM (HCM; size 25, 0.06 taper), OneShape (OS; size 25, 0.06 taper), and ProTaper Universal F2 (PTU F2; size 25, 0.08 taper) nickel-titanium files in an artificial root canal with a double (S-shaped) curvature.A total of 160 new
Hüseyin Sinan Topçuoğlu   +3 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Comparison of the Centring Ability of the ProTaper™ and ProTaper Universal™ Rotary Systems for Preparing Curved Root Canals

Australian Endodontic Journal, 2013
José Antonio Poli de Figueiredo   +2 more
exaly  

Torsional Behaviour of Rotary NiTi ProTaper Universal Instruments After Multiple Clinical Use

International Endodontic Journal, 2009
Vicente Tadeu Lopes Buono
exaly  

Heat Release, Time Required, and Cleaning Ability of Mtwo R and ProTaper Universal Retreatment Systems in the Removal of Filling Material

Journal of Endodontics, 2010
Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes   +2 more
exaly  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy