Results 111 to 120 of about 89,967 (180)
Abstract We investigate what is learned from exposure to usage in verbal morphology using an error correction mechanism within an associative learning framework. We computationally simulated how second language (L2) learners would respond to naturalistic input of aspectual usage, characterized by “imperfect contingencies,” given two types of ...
Justyna Mackiewicz +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Midwest Slavic Conference: 50th Anniversary
Program booklet for the 2002 Midwest Slavic Conference, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, March 22-23 ...
Ohio State University. Center for Slavic and East European Studies
core
Cross‐Linguistic Suffix Preference: Typological or Cognitive Bias?
Languages can be shaped by pre‐existing cognitive machinery that makes certain properties more processable. Such properties are more frequent across world languages. Most languages prefer suffixes to prefixes for grammatical meanings. Whether such typological bias is shaped by cognitive bias is debated.
Mikhail Ordin +2 more
wiley +1 more source
1992 Midwest Slavic Conference and National Hilandar Conference Program
Program booklet for the 1992 Midwest Slavic Conference and National Hilandar Conference sponsored by The Center for Slavic and East European Studies and The Resource Center for Medieval Slavic Studies, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, May 1-2,
Ohio State University. Center for Slavic and East European Studies
core
At the time of the earliest reconstructible dialectal divergences, which belong to the Late Middle Slavic period of my chronology (stages 7.0 - 8.0 of Kortlandt 1989a, 2003, 2008), the West Slavic languages represented the most conservative part of the ...
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core
On shortening, lengthening, and accent shifts in Slavic
The paper deals with several problems of Slavic historical accentology – pretonic length in the accentual paradigm c (and b) in South and West Slavic, the neo-circumflex phenomenon (including the accent in the genitive plural), the kȍkōt ‘rooster’ type ...
Mate Kapović
doaj
The article deals with the issue of the diphthongal reflexes of Proto-Slavic high vowels *i, *y, *u, and tautosyllabic *ъl/*ьl in Polabian, on both synchronic and diachronic levels.
Paweł Janczulewicz
doaj +1 more source
Proto Slavic *bystrъ or *brystrъ?
Według szeroko akceptowanej etymologii psł. *bystrw 'szybko, wartko płynący, rwący, o wodzie; szybki, prędki, żwawy; szybko pojmujący, lotny, sprytny; przeroczysty, czysty, o wodzie: uważano za odczasownikowy przymiotnik na -ro w związku z *bech(t)ati, *buchati "mocno bić, walić powodując hałas, łomotać; gwałtownie rozprzestrzeniać się, puchnąć ...
openaire +1 more source
C.C. Uhlenbeck made a distinction between two components of Proto-Indo-European, which he called A and B (1935a: 133ff.). The first component comprises pronouns, verbal roots, and derivational suffixes, and may be compared with Uralic, whereas the second
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core
The thesis that in the Proto-Slavic epoch ă and ŏ transformed not in о but in ă is proved in this article.
Jurij Jakovlevič Burmistrovič
doaj

