Publication bias
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2004 Background Publication bias, as typically defined, refers to the decreased likelihood of studies' results being published when they are near the null, not statistically significant, or otherwise "less interesting." But choices about how to analyze the ...
Phillips Carl V
doaj +5 more sources
Dealing with publication bias [PDF]
São Paulo Medical Journal, 1997 Escola Paulista de Medicina Division of Internal Medicine ; UNIFESP, EPM, Division of Internal Medicine ...
Álvaro Nagib Atallah
doaj +7 more sources
The Perils of Misinterpreting and Misusing "Publication Bias" in Meta-analyses: An Education Review on Funnel Plot-Based Methods. [PDF]
Sports Med, 2023 Publication bias refers to a systematic deviation from the truth in the results of a meta-analysis due to the higher likelihood for published studies to be included in meta-analyses than unpublished studies.
Afonso J +4 more
europepmc +2 more sources
No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias. [PDF]
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2022 Thaler and Sunstein’s “nudge” (1) has spawned a revolution in behavioral science research. Despite its popularity, the “nudge approach” has been criticized for having a “limited evidence base” (e.g., ref. 2). Mertens et al.
Maier M +5 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Quantitative evidence synthesis: a practical guide on meta-analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias tests for environmental sciences. [PDF]
Environ Evid, 2023 Meta-analysis is a quantitative way of synthesizing results from multiple studies to obtain reliable evidence of an intervention or phenomenon. Indeed, an increasing number of meta-analyses are conducted in environmental sciences, and resulting meta ...
Nakagawa S +4 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Robust Bayesian meta-analysis: Model-averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods. [PDF]
Res Synth Methods, 2023 Publication bias is a ubiquitous threat to the validity of meta‐analysis and the accumulation of scientific evidence. In order to estimate and counteract the impact of publication bias, multiple methods have been developed; however, recent simulation ...
Bartoš F +4 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology. [PDF]
BMC Biol, 2023 Collaborative efforts to directly replicate empirical studies in the medical and social sciences have revealed alarmingly low rates of replicability, a phenomenon dubbed the ‘replication crisis’.
Yang Y +8 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Current Therapeutic Research, 2016 According to the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as the Statement on Public Disclosure of Clinical Trial Results of the World Health Organization, every researcher has the ethical obligation to publish research results on all trials with human participants in a complete and accurate way within 12 months after the end of the trial.1,2 Nevertheless, for
V. Strüver
doaj +4 more sources
Publication bias is the consequence of a lack of diversity, equity, and inclusion. [PDF]
J Vasc Surg, 2021 Publication bias has been shown to exist in research across medical and surgical specialties. Bias can occur at any stage of the publication process and can be related to race, ethnicity, age, religion, sex, gender, or sexual orientation.
Rouan J +3 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Using selection models to assess sensitivity to publication bias: A tutorial and call for more routine use. [PDF]
Campbell Syst Rev, 2022 In meta‐analyses, it is critical to assess the extent to which publication bias might have compromised the results. Classical methods based on the funnel plot, including Egger's test and Trim‐and‐Fill, have become the de facto default methods to do so ...
Maier M, VanderWeele TJ, Mathur MB.
europepmc +2 more sources