Results 231 to 240 of about 937,483 (269)
Abstract Publication bias, defined as a “tendency for positive results to be overrepresented in the published literature,” was recognized and bemoaned as early as the 17th century by the chemist Robert Boyle. In the latter half of the 20th century, it began to be recognized as an increasingly serious scientific problem characterized by a
Mathias Harrer +3 more
core +3 more sources
Publication bias refers to the tendency of research results to be selectively published depending on their nature and direction, with positive and significant findings that are in line with theory being more likely to get published. This bias has been detected at the level of authors, reviewers, and journal editors alike.
Marquart, F., Matthes, J.
core +5 more sources
Publication bias arises when the likelihood of publishing a study is based on the outcome of the study. It appears to be a common problem and can mislead in several ways including interventions based on such studies, making the outcome appear greater ...
JACK L. VEVEA +2 more
core +4 more sources
A Half hour talk on Publication Bias, its effects, its causes and its ...
Astadi Pangarso +3 more
core +5 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Publication Policy or Publication Bias?
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005Although “a large number of studies have appeared in the literature that report associations of low penetrance genetic variants with disease,” as suggested in the recent CEBP editorial ([1][1]), hardly any of these reports have been translated into solid results by replication studies, at ...
Graham, Byrnes +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
In drug development, clinical medicine, or health policy making, basing one's decisions on a selective part of the available evidence can pose a major threat to the health of patients and the society. If, for example, primarily positive research reports are taken into account, one could wrongfully conclude that a harmful drug is safe.
Leon, Bax, Karel G, Moons
openaire +2 more sources
In drug development, clinical medicine, or health policy making, basing one's decisions on a selective part of the available evidence can pose a major threat to the health of patients and the society. If, for example, primarily positive research reports are taken into account, one could wrongfully conclude that a harmful drug is safe.
Leon, Bax, Karel G, Moons
openaire +2 more sources
A new ‘publication bias’: the mode of publication
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2006The editor of a medical journal may influence the opinion of his readers by a 'publication bias'. This can be through the choice of an editorial at the front of the journal, tutoring the article, the choice of an author from the Editorial Board and the organization of a press conference accompanying the publication.
openaire +2 more sources
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2012
This article offers three contributions for conducting meta-analytic reviews in education research. First, we review publication bias and the challenges it presents for meta-analytic researchers. Second, we review the most recent and optimal techniques for evaluating the presence and influence of publication bias in meta-analyses.
George C. Banks +2 more
openaire +1 more source
This article offers three contributions for conducting meta-analytic reviews in education research. First, we review publication bias and the challenges it presents for meta-analytic researchers. Second, we review the most recent and optimal techniques for evaluating the presence and influence of publication bias in meta-analyses.
George C. Banks +2 more
openaire +1 more source

