Results 271 to 280 of about 4,803,750 (317)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A kinked meta‐regression model for publication bias correction
Research Synthesis Methods, 2019Publication bias distorts the available empirical evidence and misinforms policymaking. Evidence of publication bias is mounting in virtually all fields of empirical research.
P. Bom, H. Rachinger
semanticscholar +1 more source
JAMA, 1992
The appearance of an article in the pages ofTHE JOURNALis the result of a complex and lengthy process. Scores of people, acting as investigators, funding agents, members of institutional review boards, authors, reviewers, and editors, make decisions that influence what is published. Each decision may be subject to biases: the conscious and subconscious
openaire +1 more source
The appearance of an article in the pages ofTHE JOURNALis the result of a complex and lengthy process. Scores of people, acting as investigators, funding agents, members of institutional review boards, authors, reviewers, and editors, make decisions that influence what is published. Each decision may be subject to biases: the conscious and subconscious
openaire +1 more source
Assessing Publication Bias: a 7-Step User’s Guide with Best-Practice Recommendations
Journal of business and psychology, 2022S. Kepes, Wenhao Wang, Jose M. Cortina
semanticscholar +1 more source
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.
Biometrics, 1994C. Begg, M. Mazumdar
semanticscholar +1 more source
Political Analysis, 1999
In political science and many other disciplines, statistically significant results—rejections of the null hypothesis—are achieved more frequently in published than in unpublished studies. Such “publication bias” is generally seen as the consequence of a widespread prejudice against statistically nonsignificant results.
openaire +1 more source
In political science and many other disciplines, statistically significant results—rejections of the null hypothesis—are achieved more frequently in published than in unpublished studies. Such “publication bias” is generally seen as the consequence of a widespread prejudice against statistically nonsignificant results.
openaire +1 more source
2017
Publication bias refers to the tendency of research results to be selectively published depending on their nature and direction, with positive and significant findings that are in line with theory being more likely to get published. This bias has been detected at the level of authors, reviewers, and journal editors alike.
openaire +2 more sources
Publication bias refers to the tendency of research results to be selectively published depending on their nature and direction, with positive and significant findings that are in line with theory being more likely to get published. This bias has been detected at the level of authors, reviewers, and journal editors alike.
openaire +2 more sources
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2002
Frederick P. Rivara, Peter Cummings
openaire +1 more source
Frederick P. Rivara, Peter Cummings
openaire +1 more source