Results 311 to 320 of about 3,279,698 (336)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A new ‘publication bias’: the mode of publication
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2006The editor of a medical journal may influence the opinion of his readers by a 'publication bias'. This can be through the choice of an editorial at the front of the journal, tutoring the article, the choice of an author from the Editorial Board and the organization of a press conference accompanying the publication.
openaire +3 more sources
Publication Bias and the Editorial Process
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992To the Editor. —The study by Dickersin et al from Johns Hopkins1on publication of research results and the Editorial by Dr Rennie and Ms Flanagin2neglected to analyze the response of journal editors to the reputation of the institution from which the manuscript originated.
openaire +6 more sources
Assessment of Publication Bias
2021Ideally, all methodologically sound clinical studies should be published and be included in a systematic review if they adequately address the question at hand. In reality, only a proportion of all initiated studies are completed, and only a proportion of these are published within a reasonable time.
openaire +2 more sources
Publication bias and clinical trials
Controlled Clinical Trials, 1987A study was performed to evaluate the extent to which the medical literature may be misleading as a result of selective publication of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with results showing a statistically significant treatment effect. Three hundred eighteen authors of published trials were asked whether they had participated in any unpublished RCTs ...
Thomas C. Chalmers +4 more
openaire +3 more sources
Publication Bias in the Anesthesiology Literature
Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2012Publication bias occurs because positive finding studies are more likely to be published. The dearth of studies of negative or equivalence findings can erroneously affect future research and potentially clinical care of patients. We hypothesized that positive studies were more likely to be published than negative studies in anesthesiology journals with
Robert J. McCarthy +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Tackling submission and publication bias
BMJ, 2017Evoniuk and colleagues analysed whether submission and publication bias are based on study outcome.1 They retrospectively reviewed 1064 drug research studies sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline over six years and did not find evidence for either bias.1 This finding is different from previous studies and discussions.234 Has the acceptance of studies reporting “
Spiegel, Rainer +4 more
openaire +4 more sources
, 2019
Selective publication and reporting in individual papers compromise the scientific record, but are meta-analyses as compromised as their constituent studies?
Maya B. Mathur, T. VanderWeele
semanticscholar +1 more source
Selective publication and reporting in individual papers compromise the scientific record, but are meta-analyses as compromised as their constituent studies?
Maya B. Mathur, T. VanderWeele
semanticscholar +1 more source
Measuring capital-labor substitution: The importance of method choices and publication bias
Review of economic dynamics (Print), 2021S. Gechert +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
2009
Many in the UK remember the political advisor who thought that the day after 9/11 was a good one to “bury bad news.” It is an issue that many consider very seriously. When is the best time to announce the closure of a plant, the laying off of a large part of the workforce, or the resignation of a well-loved (or much-hated) senior manager?
openaire +2 more sources
Many in the UK remember the political advisor who thought that the day after 9/11 was a good one to “bury bad news.” It is an issue that many consider very seriously. When is the best time to announce the closure of a plant, the laying off of a large part of the workforce, or the resignation of a well-loved (or much-hated) senior manager?
openaire +2 more sources