Results 1 to 10 of about 575,771 (143)

RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses [PDF]

open access: yesBMC Medicine, 2013
Background There is growing interest in realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example, by explaining the success, failure or mixed ...
Wong Geoff   +4 more
doaj   +4 more sources

RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews [PDF]

open access: yesBMC Medicine, 2013
Background Meta-narrative review is one of an emerging menu of new approaches to qualitative and mixed-method systematic review. A meta-narrative review seeks to illuminate a heterogeneous topic area by highlighting the contrasting and complementary ways
Wong Geoff   +4 more
doaj   +4 more sources

Publication standards

open access: yesINFAD, 2017
Would you like to publish with us? We welcome you.
Asociación Infad
doaj   +3 more sources

Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses – Evolving Standards) project

open access: yesHealth Services and Delivery Research, 2014
Background: There is growing interest in theory-driven, qualitative and mixed-method approaches to systematic review, such as realist and meta-narrative review.
Geoff Wong   +3 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Publication standards

open access: yesINFAD, 2016
Do you want to publish with us? You are welcome!
Florencio Vicente Castro
doaj   +8 more sources

Publication standards

open access: yesINFAD, 2018
Do you wish to submit a paper? You are welcome!
Florencio Vicente Castro
doaj   +12 more sources

"Getting your message through": an editorial guide for meeting publication standards [PDF]

open access: yesScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2009
Ringdal Kjetil G   +2 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Standards for Ethical Publication [PDF]

open access: yesEar, Nose & Throat Journal, 2006
Authors are ethically obligated to be sure that data are presented accurately and in a fair and unbiased way. The supporting data for any scientific investigation should be maintained in authors’ office files for a minimum of 5 to 7 years after publication. (This is dependent on the study and the governing agency.
Jonas T, Johnson   +12 more
  +15 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy