Results 251 to 260 of about 859,799 (293)
Contemporary advances in lithium–sulfur batteries are mapped across liquid, quasi‐solid, and all‐solid‐state architectures. The review clarifies operating mechanisms, highlights transition from polysulfide‐mediated to solid‐state conversions, and surveys state‐of‐the‐art materials and characterization. Commercial hurdles and actionable design rules are
Yiheng Shao +4 more
wiley +1 more source
This perspective highlights how machine learning accelerates sustainable energy materials discovery by integrating quantum‐accurate interatomic potentials with property prediction frameworks. The evolution from statistical methods to physics‐informed neural networks is examined, showcasing applications across batteries, catalysts, and photovoltaics ...
Kwang S. Kim
wiley +1 more source
Rapid and energy‐efficient Joule‐heating synthesis enables the formation of high‐performance Mn‐based disordered rock‐salt (DRX) cathodes through multiscale structural optimization. A case study on Li1.2Mn0.4Ti0.4O2 and its extension to various DRX compositions highlights the potential of this approach for scalable, fast, and effective discovery of ...
Sang‐Wook Park +16 more
wiley +1 more source
Prisons as Progressive Punishment? The State of Corrective Services
Mark Findlay
openalex +1 more source
Creole and Unusual Punishment - A Tenth Anniversary Examination of Louisiana's Capital Rape Statute
James H. S. Levine
openalex +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
WIREs Cognitive Science, 2014
Retributivism is a deontological theory of punishment that calls for the deserved punishment of a guilty offender in proportion with his moral blameworthiness for a past offense. It is often referred to as punishment based on ‘just deserts’, and it contrasts with consequentialist theories that ground punishment in its potentially beneficial future ...
Geoffrey P, Goodwin, Dena M, Gromet
openaire +2 more sources
Retributivism is a deontological theory of punishment that calls for the deserved punishment of a guilty offender in proportion with his moral blameworthiness for a past offense. It is often referred to as punishment based on ‘just deserts’, and it contrasts with consequentialist theories that ground punishment in its potentially beneficial future ...
Geoffrey P, Goodwin, Dena M, Gromet
openaire +2 more sources

