Results 141 to 150 of about 16,241 (191)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Pure Tone Audiometry in Noise with Auraldomes

International Journal of Audiology, 1975
Pure tone thresholds were obtained using a TDH-39 driver mounted in a standard (MX-41/AR) cushion and an Auraldome (AR-100-R) circumaural enclosure. Thresholds were recorded in quiet and in the presence of broad band sound field noise at 50, 60, and 70 dB SPL.
R J, Roeser, A, Glorig
openaire   +2 more sources

Vibrotactile Thresholds in Pure Tone Audiometry

Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1970
Research into vibrotactile sensations at the ear is complicated by the problem of distinguishing them from auditory sensations.
A, Boothroyd, S, Cawkwell
openaire   +2 more sources

Pure Tone Audiometry

1955
The results of a test are no better than the competency of the person performing the test. Perfect equipment in the hands of someone untrained, disinterested, or unimaginatively following printed instructions will not produce consistently accurate, worth-while test results.
Morris F. Heller   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2022
Abstract Background There is an increasing need to administer hearing tests outside of sound-attenuating rooms. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) from published in standards (Occupational Health and Safety Administration [OSHA] 1983; American National Standards Institute [ANSI] S3.1‐1999 (R2018)) can be modified to account for the ...
Robert H, Margolis   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Comparison of pure tone thresholds obtained via automated audiometry and standard pure tone audiometry

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012
It is likely that the role of automated audiometry will expand in both clinical and research settings in the next few years. A novel method for measuring pure tone thresholds using an automated threshold measurement method is reported here. The Automated Audiometry for the NIH Toolbox (AANT) test was developed for use in the NIH Toolbox multi ...
David A. Eddins   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

Audiometry in General Practice: Validation of a Pragmatic Pure-tone Audiometry Method

Scandinavian Audiology, 1998
The aim of this study was to validate the results of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry performed in a typical practice setting by comparing with test results obtained in a standardized audiological setting in accordance with the ISO standards. In a single-blinded crossover design, 119 persons were tested (0.25-8 kHz) in both settings. The mean deviations
Karlsmose, Bo   +3 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Pure Tone Audiometry with the Mentally Retarded

Exceptional Children, 1958
This hearing survey was performed at the Kentucky Training Home, Frankfort, Kentucky. The authors wish to express their appreciation to A. M. Lyon, superintendent, L. F. Boland, medical director, and Ashley Mixson, psychologist, for their valuable assistance.
Frank Kodman   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

Pure-Tone Audiometry and Masking

International Journal of Audiology, 2011
Pure-Tone Audiometry and Masking is an excellent resource and reference for the intermediate student, clinicians, and instructors.
openaire   +1 more source

Pure Tone Audiometry in Older People

British Journal of Audiology, 1975
Hearing loss measured by pure-tone audiometry is described for the better ear, using the median with 95% confidence limits, in seven sound frequencies in a random sample of older people (215 men and 272 women). Both sexes showed increases in hearing loss in each frequency with increasing age. Hearing loss was greater in women at frequencies of 1000 c.p.
J. S. Milne, I. J. Lauder
openaire   +1 more source

Quantization Error in Clinical Pure-Tone Audiometry

Scandinavian Audiology, 1992
The current clinical procedure for pure-tone audiometry was analysed for statistical measurement errors. Theoretically, the root-mean-square (RMS) error in a single threshold measurement is always greater than the standard deviation (SD) of measured intra-individual test-retest differences, divided by the square root of two.
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy