Results 121 to 130 of about 2,621 (163)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2018
Pyrrhonism was the name given by the Greeks to one particular brand of scepticism, that identified (albeit tenuously) with Pyrrho of Elis, who was said (by his disciple Timon of Phlius) to have declared that everything was indeterminable and accordingly to have suspended judgment about the reality of things – in particular whether they were really good
openaire +1 more source
Pyrrhonism was the name given by the Greeks to one particular brand of scepticism, that identified (albeit tenuously) with Pyrrho of Elis, who was said (by his disciple Timon of Phlius) to have declared that everything was indeterminable and accordingly to have suspended judgment about the reality of things – in particular whether they were really good
openaire +1 more source
1994
Abstract The central thesis of Part 2 of this study is that no justificatory theory seems to show any prospects of solving the Agrippa problem. Does this show that there is no fact of the matter in knowing? At restricted levels of scrutiny, there are facts of the matter in knowing.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract The central thesis of Part 2 of this study is that no justificatory theory seems to show any prospects of solving the Agrippa problem. Does this show that there is no fact of the matter in knowing? At restricted levels of scrutiny, there are facts of the matter in knowing.
openaire +1 more source
2008
Pyrrhonism is commonly confused with scepticism in Western philosophy. Unlike sceptics, who believe there are no true beliefs, Pyrrhonists suspend judgment about all beliefs, including the belief that there are no true beliefs. Pyrrhonism was developed by a line of ancient Greek philosophers, from its founder Pyrrho of Elis in the fourth century BCE ...
openaire +1 more source
Pyrrhonism is commonly confused with scepticism in Western philosophy. Unlike sceptics, who believe there are no true beliefs, Pyrrhonists suspend judgment about all beliefs, including the belief that there are no true beliefs. Pyrrhonism was developed by a line of ancient Greek philosophers, from its founder Pyrrho of Elis in the fourth century BCE ...
openaire +1 more source
Skepticism, naturalism, pyrrhonism
Philosophical Issues, 2022AbstractSkepticism and naturalism bear important connections with one another. Do they conflict or are they different sides of the same coin? In this paper, by considering the ways in which Sextus and Hume have examined these issues, I offer a Pyrrhonian response to Penelope Maddy's attempt to reject skepticism within the form of naturalism that she ...
openaire +1 more source
2013
Pyrrhonism can safely be said to be the most prominent and influential form of skepticism in the history of Western philosophy. It was an important philosophical movement in the Hellenistic and Imperial ages, made a tremendous impact on modern philosophy, and some of its arguments continue to be a central topic of discussion in the contemporary ...
openaire +1 more source
Pyrrhonism can safely be said to be the most prominent and influential form of skepticism in the history of Western philosophy. It was an important philosophical movement in the Hellenistic and Imperial ages, made a tremendous impact on modern philosophy, and some of its arguments continue to be a central topic of discussion in the contemporary ...
openaire +1 more source
The Philosophical Quarterly, 2008
Journal compilation © 20098 The Editors of The Philosophical Quarterly ; Garrett ...
openaire +2 more sources
Journal compilation © 20098 The Editors of The Philosophical Quarterly ; Garrett ...
openaire +2 more sources
Renaissance Pyrrhonism: A Relative Phenomenon
2009"More than any other kind of philosophy, Pyrrhonism exalts relativity, if only, in the first place, by opening up the dogmatist's horizons to new aspects of familiar phenomena. But there is another relativity factor, a more extrinsic one: the very different textual elements of its diffusion in Europe in fragmentary texts of which the reception was ...
openaire +3 more sources
2004
Abstract Fogelin claims that when he and others reflect on how we disregard uneliminated but eliminable defeaters while making knowledge claims in everyday life, our level of scrutiny rises, and we are inclined to give up those claims to know.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Fogelin claims that when he and others reflect on how we disregard uneliminated but eliminable defeaters while making knowledge claims in everyday life, our level of scrutiny rises, and we are inclined to give up those claims to know.
openaire +1 more source
2004
Abstract This essay invokes a technical framework of contrast classes within which Pyrrhonians can accept (or deny) knowledge claims that are relativized to specific contrast classes, but avoid all unrelativized knowledge claims and all presuppositions about which contrast classes are really relevant.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract This essay invokes a technical framework of contrast classes within which Pyrrhonians can accept (or deny) knowledge claims that are relativized to specific contrast classes, but avoid all unrelativized knowledge claims and all presuppositions about which contrast classes are really relevant.
openaire +1 more source
2020
La réflexion de Montaigne se caractérise moins comme une affirmation positive que comme un manque. On n’y trouvera pas une théorie du sujet capable d’opposer la supériorité du doute, à la manière du cogito cartésien, mais une aide à la formulation, théorique et non pas expérimentale, du rôle du sujet, selon un « internalisme », dans la tradition néo ...
openaire +1 more source
La réflexion de Montaigne se caractérise moins comme une affirmation positive que comme un manque. On n’y trouvera pas une théorie du sujet capable d’opposer la supériorité du doute, à la manière du cogito cartésien, mais une aide à la formulation, théorique et non pas expérimentale, du rôle du sujet, selon un « internalisme », dans la tradition néo ...
openaire +1 more source