Results 101 to 110 of about 48,600 (163)

The Day Evaluation Q-Sort

European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2022
Abstract. The Day Evaluation Q-sort (DEQ) is a measure designed to describe the day as it is experienced. In two undergraduate samples ( Ns = 472 and 302), this research explores how the day is described, and how the evaluation of the day relates to personality attributes and to time spent in various daily activities.
Travis J. Miller, Daniel J. Ozer
openaire   +1 more source

An Automated Procedure for Correlation of Q-Sorts

Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977
A set of computer programs which calculates correlations between Q-sort decks is described. These programs automatically process Q-sort decks in which the items are printed directly on IBM cards, thus enabling the rapid analysis of large volumes of Q-sort data. An application of this method to the assessment of family interaction is described.
G S, Dibb, B K, Alexander
openaire   +2 more sources

Effect of Order and Form in the Q-Sort

Psychological Reports, 1967
Data from 476 high school Ss show that whether statements or adjectives are used in a Q-sort influences the magnitude of the correlation of self-sort and ideal-sort.
J, Quarter, D R, Kennedy, R M, Laxer
openaire   +2 more sources

Psychological Implications of the Psychopathy Q-Sort

Journal of Personality Assessment, 1995
The construct validity of the Psychopathy Q-sort (PQS; Reise & Oliver, 1994) was investigated by correlating it with an array of observer-based and self-report personality measures in a sample of 350 men and women assessed at the Institute of Personality Assessment and Research (IPAR). High discriminant validity of the PQS was indicated by a pattern of
S P, Reise, P, Wink
openaire   +2 more sources

The Q sort theory and technique

Nurse Education Today, 1989
This paper is based on the author's experience of using the Q sort technique with BA Social Sciences (BASS) students, and the community psychiatric nursing (CPN, ENB No 811 course). The paper focuses on two main issues: 1. The theoretical assumptions underpinning the Q Sort technique.
openaire   +2 more sources

The Psychopathy Q-Sort

Assessment, 2007
Scant research has examined the validity of instruments that permit observer ratings of psychopathy. Using a nonclinical (undergraduate) sample, the authors examined the associations between both self-and observer ratings on a psychopathy prototype (Psychopathy Q-Sort, PQS) and widely used measures of psychopathy, antisocial behavior, and negative ...
Katherine A, Fowler, Scott O, Lilienfeld
openaire   +2 more sources

The Riverside Situational Q-sort

2020
Social psychology studies the impact of situational variables on behavior but has developed few methods to describe these variables. The Riverside Situational Q-Sort (RSQ; Funder, 2016; Wagerman & Funder, 2009) is the first validated tool developed to assess the psychological characteristics of situations.
Kyle S. Sauerberger, David C. Funder
openaire   +1 more source

Note on the Reliability of Q-Sort Data

Psychological Reports, 1956
Test-retest reliability coefficients were computed for personality data using Q-sorts by 10 Ss. Coefficients of correlation were high (between .93 and .97), suggesting that the technique yields reliable measures.
openaire   +1 more source

Development and validation of a Q‐sort measure of identity processing style: The identity processing style Q‐sort☆

Journal of Adolescence, 2009
ABSTRACTIdentity styles represent strategies individuals use to explore identity‐related issues. Berzonsky (Berzonsky, M. D. (1992). Identity style and coping strategies. Journal of Personality, 60, 771–788) identified three styles: informational, normative, and diffuse.
Joe F, Pittman, Jennifer L, Kerpelman, Leanne K, Lamke, Donna L, Sollie   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Structured Interview and Q-Sort

2012
To achieve content validity, the measurement items are created through rigorous and extensive review of literature to cover the domain of the constructs. To pre-assess the reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the scales, the common pool of items is reviewed and evaluated by practitioners. Structured interviews are conducted to
Mei Cao, Qingyu Zhang
openaire   +1 more source