Results 281 to 290 of about 84,859 (325)

On Ostrowski inequality for quantum calculus

Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2021
We disprove a version of Ostrowski inequality for quantum calculus appearing in the literature. We derive a correct statement and prove that our new inequality is sharp. We also derive a midpoint inequality.
Aglić-Aljinović, Andrea   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

On Linear Dynamics in Quantum Calculus

Results in Mathematics, 2013
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Bennasr, Lassad   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Quantum Probability Calculus as Fuzzy-Kolmogorovian Probability Calculus

AIP Conference Proceedings, 2009
Representation of quantum logics by families of fuzzy sets allows to build fuzzy set‐theoretic models of quantum probability spaces in a way fully analogous to the Kolmogorov construction of a classical probability space. Therefore, quantum probability calculus on the one hand may be seen as a special kind of fuzzy probability calculi, and on the other
Jarosław Pykacz   +7 more
openaire   +1 more source

Quantum stochastic calculus

1986
The basic integrator processes of quantum stochastic calculus, namely, creation, conservation, and annihilation, are introduced in the Hilbert space of square integrable Brownian functionals. Stochastic integrals with respect to these processes and a quantum Ito’s formula are described.
openaire   +1 more source

Quantum Variational Calculus

2014
Introduces readers to the treatment of the calculus of variations with q-differences and Hahn difference operators Provides the reader with the first extended treatment of quantum variational calculus Shows how the techniques described can be applied to economic models as well as other mathematical systems This Brief puts together two subjects, quantum
Malinowska, Agnieszka B., Torres, Delfim
openaire   +2 more sources

Symmetric Quantum Calculus

2002
The q- and h-differentials may be “symmetrized“ in the following way, $$ \tilde d_q f(x) = f(qx) - f(q^{ - 1} x), $$ (26.1) $$ \tilde d_h g(x) = g(x + h) - g(x - h), $$ (26.2) where as usual, q ≠ 1 and h ≠ 0. The definitions of the corresponding derivatives follow obviously: $$ \tilde D_q f(x) = \frac{{\tilde d_q f(x)}} {{\tilde
Victor Kac, Pokman Cheung
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy