Results 1 to 10 of about 630,560 (262)
Pocket-Surface Discrete Differential Geometry as a Leakage-Robust Feature Class for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction. [PDF]
Balcı MA +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Fasciola Metacercaria Contamination in Wetland Pastures and Its Association With Forage Characteristics Across Agro-Ecological Zones: Case of Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia. [PDF]
Milkyas M +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
Sigma-1 and Sigma-2 receptors exhibit divergent genome-wide Co-expression architectures in human brain despite shared subcellular localization. [PDF]
Harbert DH.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
A WEIGHTED RANK MEASURE OF CORRELATION
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 2005SummarySpearman's rank correlation coefficient is not entirely suitable for measuring the correlation between two rankings in some applications because it treats all ranks equally. In 2000, Blest proposed an alternative measure of correlation that gives more importance to higher ranks but has some drawbacks.
CARLOS Soares
exaly +2 more sources
Psychometrika, 1956
A formula is developed for the correlation between a ranking (possibly including ties) and a dichotomy, with limits which are always ±1. This formula is shown to be equivalent both to Kendall's τ and Spearman's ρ.
openaire +1 more source
A formula is developed for the correlation between a ranking (possibly including ties) and a dichotomy, with limits which are always ±1. This formula is shown to be equivalent both to Kendall's τ and Spearman's ρ.
openaire +1 more source
On blest's measure of rank correlation
Canadian Journal of Statistics, 2003AbstractBlest (2000) proposed a new nonparametric measure of correlation between two random variables. His coefficient, which is dissymmetric in its arguments, emphasizes discrepancies observed among the first ranks in the orderings induced by the variables.
Genest, Christian +1 more
openaire +2 more sources
A New Measure of Rank Correlation
Biometrika, 19381. In psychological work the problem of comparing two different rankings of the same set of individuals may be divided into two types. In the first type the individuals have a given order A which is objectively defined with reference to some quality, and a characteristic question is: if an observer ranks the individuals in an order B, does a comparison
openaire +2 more sources

