Results 51 to 60 of about 1,831 (174)
Abstract This essay revisits the early methodology of Rudolph von Jhering. It has often been dismissed due to its heavy metaphysics, unwieldy presentation, and alleged neglect of teleology. But a charitable reconstruction in contemporary terms reveals a coherence theory of jurisprudence that is in many ways superior to current coherence accounts.
Pascal Felix Meier
wiley +1 more source
Ratio Decidendi Hakim dalam penetapan Nafkah ‘Iddah dan Mut’ah perspektif Fathu Dzari’ah [PDF]
ABSTRAK Ratio Decidendi Hakim Pengadilan Agama pada kasus perceraian merupakan alasan suatu putusan pengadilan dan merupakan bagian dari putusan yang tertuang pada akhir suatu perkara.
Prasastiningtyas, Lilia
core
The Ratio Decidendi through Mexican Lens
In March 2021, the Mexican Constitution was amended to transition to a system of precedents. This amendment mandates that the “reasons” of Supreme Court rulings will be binding on the lower courts. However, the reform is rooted in a long-standing practice of ‘Tesis’, i.e., abstract statements that the Court itself identifies when deciding a case ...
openaire +1 more source
Re C (Surrogacy: Consent) and Re Z (Surrogacy: Step‐Parent Adoption) recount one non‐traditional family's struggle for formal legal recognition. The subject child was born pursuant to a surrogacy arrangement entered into in the UK by a male couple and a woman.
Rob Marsh
wiley +1 more source
Los precedentes judiciales en el derecho constitucional colombiano
La regla de precedente es la norma de los sistemas jurídicos que define el funcionamiento normativo de los precedentes judiciales. Los precedentes judiciales son normas generales y abstractas originadas en una decisión judicial.
Fabio Enrique Pulido Ortiz
doaj +1 more source
Este artículo tiene por objetivo presentar los principales puntos de la discusión alrededor del texto “Sobre la maximización de los precedentes y de la jurisprudencia” de Álvaro Núñez Vaquero, formulados por Sandra Gómora, Luiz Guilherme Marinoni, y Luca
Carla Iuspa Santelices +1 more
doaj
Same‐Sex Unions in Hong Kong and the Misuse of Comparative Law: Sham Tsz Kit v Secretary for Justice
In 2023, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (CFA) handed down a significant decision requiring the creation of an alternative legal framework to recognise same‐sex unions. The judgment marked the culmination of two decades of strategic litigation challenging various forms of sexual orientation discrimination in Hong Kong, yet it fell short of ...
Michael Ramsden
wiley +1 more source
Courts against backsliding: Lessons from Latin America
Abstract The recent wave of autocratization in Latin America has put courts at the center of debates about regime and regime change. Much of the literature on the judicial politics of democratic backsliding focuses on incumbents' efforts to capture judiciaries and weaponize them against the regime. Our approach is different. We provide illustrations of
Laura Gamboa +2 more
wiley +1 more source
What Is the Ideal Dimension of Law?
Abstract Various authors have claimed that law has an ideal dimension owed to a claim to correctness. Against this thesis, this article argues that there are several ideal dimensions of law, namely, a moral, a legal, and an ontological one. All of them are independent of a claim to correctness.
Lorenz Kaehler
wiley +1 more source
DIFERENÇAS ENTRE TESE E RATIO DECIDENDI: EXTRAÇÃO, ALCANCE E DINÂMICA
O presente artigo argumenta que a identificação dos precedentes com as teses deles extraídas não é uma prática adequada, nos termos da teoria dos precedentes.
Pugliese, William Soares
core +1 more source

