Results 1 to 10 of about 52,765 (246)
Rational Fair Consensus in the Gossip Model [PDF]
2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), 2017 The \emph{rational fair consensus problem} can be informally defined as follows. Consider a network of $n$ (selfish) \emph{rational agents}, each of them initially supporting a \emph{color} chosen from a finite set $ Σ$. The goal is to design a protocol that leads the network to a stable monochromatic configuration (i.e.
Clementi, Andrea +3 more
openaire +6 more sources
Rational PBFT Consensus Algorithm with Evolutionary Game [PDF]
Jisuanji kexue, 2022 Byzantine fault-tolerant algorithm is vital to ensure the distributed system such as blockchain reaching consistency.The performance of algorithm affects the security and stability of the system.In view of the low efficiency and lack of incentive ...
YANG Xin-yu, PENG Chang-gen, YANG Hui, DING Hong-fa
doaj +2 more sources
RACIONALAUS KONSENSUSO PROBLEMA: J. RAWLSAS VERSUS J. F. LYOTARD’AS
Problemos, 2004 Straipsnyje aptariami, lyginami ir analizuojami dviejų priešingiems šiuolaikinės politinės filosofijos poliams atstovaujančių teoretikų – vėlyvojo Johno Rawlso ir Jeano Francois Lyotard’o – požiūriai į racionalaus politinio konsensuso problemą. Siekiama
Nida Vasiliauskaitė
doaj +24 more sources
Towards Rational Consensus in Honest Majority
2024 IEEE 44th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS)Distributed consensus protocols reach agreement among $n$ players in the presence of $f$ adversaries; different protocols support different values of $f$. Existing works study this problem for different adversary types (captured by threat models). There are three primary threat models: (i) Crash fault tolerance (CFT), (ii) Byzantine fault tolerance ...
Varul Srivastava, Sujit Gujar
openaire +4 more sources
A Survey on Habermas' Legal Discourse as the Logic of Law [PDF]
فلسفه حقوق, 2023 The main purpose of the current study is to examine Habermas' legal discourse as the logic of law. In Habermas' theory regarding legal discourse, the process of legal norming is considered as a method for the rationality in the field of legal reasoning ...
Ahmad Deylami, Fatemeh Montazer
doaj +1 more source
Expert Consensus on the Application of Ulinastatin in Common Clinical Critical Illness [PDF]
Zhongguo quanke yixue, 2023 Ulinastatin is mainly applied in the treatment of acute pancreatitis, but also in other common clinical critical illnesses such as shock, sepsis, evere pneumonia, cute respiratory distress syndrome, several acute poisoning, severe heat stroke, severe ...
Expert group of expert consensus on the application of ulinastatin in common clinical critical illness
doaj +1 more source
An Explanation of Deliberative Democracy in Philosophical Thoughts of Habermas [PDF]
حکمت و فلسفه, 2010 As democracy has a generative nature, there is continuing discussion and study about its principles, teachings, objectives and conceptual development.
hoseyn harsih, jalal hajizadeh
doaj +1 more source
Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, 2016 We provide a game-theoretic analysis of consensus, assuming that processes are controlled by rational agents and may fail by crashing. We consider agents that care only about consensus: that is, (a) an agent's utility depends only on the consensus value achieved (and not, for example, on the number of messages the agent sends) and (b) agents strictly ...
Joseph Y. Halpern, Xavier Vilaça
openaire +1 more source
CoRR, 2020 We provide a game-theoretic analysis of consensus, assuming that processes are controlled by rational agents and may fail by crashing. We consider agents that \emph{care only about consensus}: that is, (a) an agent's utility depends only on the consensus value achieved (and not, for example, on the number of messages the agent sends) and (b) agents ...
Joseph Y. Halpern, Xavier Vilaça
openaire +2 more sources
The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory
Informal Logic, 2003 This paper argues that Habermas's conception of the rationality of moral and legal discussions has import for argumentation theorists interested in the rationality of public deliberations in politics and law.
Eveline T. Feteris
doaj +1 more source