Constructing Difference: Maternal Boundary‐Work in Science‐Based and Natural Mom Groups on Facebook
Boundary‐work describes the activities of social groups as they seek to differentiate themselves from others to establish credibility, authority, or to protect their interests. While a growing body of literature explores occupational boundary‐work in health care, limited research has focused on how lay actors practice boundary‐work online.
Darryn DiFrancesco
wiley +1 more source
Trust has a price?! Unraveling the dynamics between trust in the media and the willingness to pay in the post-pandemic scenario. [PDF]
Voci D +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Józef Dietl (1804-1878) and "his" crisis: Eponyms of a political physician and the culture of remembrance in Polish and Austrian urology and medicine. [PDF]
Moll FH, Chlosta P, Shariat SF.
europepmc +1 more source
Editorial: Constructing objectivity: emotions in legal decision-making. [PDF]
Johansen LV +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
When Facts Become Forbidden: The Past and Present History of Scientific Censorship. [PDF]
Mann DL.
europepmc +1 more source
Free will and trolley dilemmas: evidence for moral inertia in a Venezuelan sample. [PDF]
Andrade G, Gamboa L, Campo-Redondo M.
europepmc +1 more source
The Brain as a Whole? Neuroendocrine Functions and Death by Neurological Criteria. [PDF]
Berendes S.
europepmc +1 more source
Related searches:
Some Reluctant Skepticism about Rational Insight
International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 2023Abstract There is much to admire in John Pittard’s recent book on the epistemology of disagreement. But here we develop one concern about the role that rational insight plays in his project. Pittard develops and defends a view on which a party to peer disagreement can show substantial partiality to his own view, so long as he enjoys even moderate ...
Tomas Bogardus, Michael Burton
openaire +1 more source
Skepticism, Mental Disorder and Rationality
International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 2023Abstract I stipulate and motivate the overlooked problem of demarcating radical skeptics (perceptual and moral) from mentally disordered persons, given that both deny that they know ordinary Moorean propositions (e.g., that they have hands or that killing for fun is morally wrong). Call this ‘the demarcation problem’.
openaire +1 more source
In this paper we propose a version of default logic with the following two properties: (1) defaults with mutually inconsistent justifications are never used together in constructing a set of default consequences of a theory; (2) the reasoning formalized by our logic is related to the traditional skeptical mode of default reasoning.
Artur Mikitiuk, Miroslaw Truszczyński
openaire +1 more source

