Results 111 to 120 of about 24,310 (310)

What is (de)politicization and what is wrong with it?

open access: yesAmerican Journal of Political Science, EarlyView.
Abstract This article attempts to clarify the meaning of (de)politicization. Politicization sometimes refers to the inappropriate intrusion of partisan loyalties in nonpolitical social domains (affective politicization). Politicization can also constitute an ideal of civic agency and energy (contestatory politicization).
Dimitrios Halikias
wiley   +1 more source

¿Es política la justicia como equidad?

open access: yesIdeas y Valores, 2013
Se analiza si la versión de la justicia como equidad, presentada en El liberalismo político, es genuinamente una concepción política. Se examina el problema de la razonabilidad de las doctrinas comprehensivas, y se indaga luego si el argumento en dos ...
Luis Villavicencio Miranda
doaj  

What if Adam Smith Debated an AI Economist: A Thought Experiment on Markets, Ethics, and the Invisible Hand

open access: yesBusiness Ethics, the Environment &Responsibility, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Can AI‐driven capitalism sustain the moral preconditions of market order? We stage a dialogue between Adam Smith and a steel‐manned “EconAI” to test four Moral‐Market‐Fitness criteria: trustworthiness, fairness, non‐domination, and contestability, across 11 dilemmas.
Alexandra‐Codruța Bîzoi   +1 more
wiley   +1 more source

Critical Analysis of Michael J. Sandal’s Philosophy of Political and Social Affairs [PDF]

open access: yesپژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی, 2017
Michael J. Sandal (born March 1993) is an American Political philosopher and professor at Harward University. He is best known for the Harward Course Justice and for his critique of John Rawls’s “Theory of Justice”. Sandal in his book "Public Philosophy",
Ahmad Reza Tabatabai
doaj  

“Yet the Problem Remains”: Why Genetic Determinism Still Haunts Biomedical Research

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT After the horrors of the Holocaust and its connections to eugenics were revealed to the world, many post‐war population geneticists sought to establish rhetorical distance from the Nazi's state‐led campaigns, without abandoning their belief that actively shaping the population's genetics would produce a prosperous society.
Christopher R. Donohue, Ian A. Myles
wiley   +1 more source

Waverly Duck and Anne Rawls discuss their new book, Tacit Racism [PDF]

open access: yes, 2020
Episode 10 features co-authors Waverly Duck, Distinguished Visiting Scholar, 2020-21, Center for Diversity Innovation, University at Buffalo, and Anne Rawls, Professor of Sociology at Bentley University.
Rawls, Anne, Duck, Waverly
core  

The Agents of Climate Justice in Healthcare

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This paper addresses the critical issue of decarbonising healthcare systems to help combat climate change. I focus on identifying the ‘agents of justice’ responsible for this transformation. Beginning with the claim that healthcare's greenhouse gas emissions cause injustice, the paper assumes that achieving a net zero healthcare system is ...
Joshua Parker
wiley   +1 more source

Prefacio a la edición francesa de A Theory of Justice (1986) [trad. de Emilio Martínez Navarro].

open access: yesDaimon, 1997
Prefacio a la edición francesa de A Theory of Justice (1986) [trad. de Emilio Martínez Navarro].
John Rawls
doaj  

Envy and politics; Nozick vs. Rawls [PDF]

open access: yesFaṣlnāmah-i Pizhūhish/hā-yi Rāhburdī-i Siyāsat, 2014
Envy and politics; Nozick vs. Rawls   Seyd Reza Mosavi*   (Received: 2014/Jone/17 – Accept: 2014/Octobr/27)     Abstract   In order to create a fair and neutral position Rawls disregards the psychological features such as altruism and envy that might ...
Seyd Reza Mousavi
doaj  

Dealing With Conflicts in Medical Decisions: Epistemic Reasonable Disagreement Between Parents and Medical Staff

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Many controversies in medical ethics, particularly those involving conflicts between parents and medical staff over decisions about child patients, are challenging to manage without causing significant polarization and communication issues. This is primarily because the parties involved—parents and physicians—operate at different epistemic ...
Chiara Innorta
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy