Results 41 to 50 of about 12,629,330 (263)

The revised RE-AIM/PRISM framework [20].

, 2022
The revised RE-AIM/PRISM framework [20].
Nicholas Graves (258283), Sze Ling Chan (4515145), Fahad Javaid Siddiqui (10499737), Andrew Fu Wah Ho (2634940), Jin Wee Lee (12412222), Marcus Eng Hock Ong (8755161), Nan Liu (1630)   +6 more
core   +1 more source

Schematic figure depicting the RE-AIM framework.

, 2022
Schematic figure depicting the RE-AIM framework.
Colm Travers (13570168), Branishka Lewis (13570162), Kunda Mutesu-Kapembwa (6271829), J. Anitha Menon (4836996), Aaron Mangangu (13570171), Albert Manasyan (714838), Martha Mwendafilumba (5331644), Nobutu Muttau (13570159), Keilya Kasprzyk (13570165), Herbert Kapesa (13570174)   +9 more
core   +1 more source

RE-AIM framework MDIC criteria (adapted for sports injury context) with percentage of studies reporting each item on the checklist.

, 2023
RE-AIM framework MDIC criteria (adapted for sports injury context) with percentage of studies reporting each item on the checklist.
John O’Hara (4722894), Stacey Emmonds (4062928), Thomas Hughes (136665), Nick London (16632304), Alan Burton (12900008)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

An Extension Application of the RE-AIM Evaluation Framework

Journal of Extension, 2017
RE-AIM is an evaluation framework that has been widely used by public health professionals for over 15 years and is well documented in public health literature. RE-AIM evaluates health promotion programs on five dimensions—reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance.
Downey, Laura H., Peterson, Donna J., Donaldson, Joseph L., Hardman, Alisha   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Using the RE‐AIM framework for dissemination and implementation of psychosocial distress screening [PDF]

European Journal of Cancer Care, 2019
To evaluate the RE-AIM framework's effect on retention of participants and implementation outcomes of a 5-year cancer research education programme on psychosocial distress screening in cancer centres across the United States.A one-group pre-/post-test design was used to evaluate the programme on participant retention and implementation outcomes at 6 ...
Mark Lazenby, Elizabeth Ercolano, Hui Tan, Leah Ferrucci, Terry Badger, Marcia Grant, Paul Jacobsen, Ruth McCorkle   +7 more
openaire   +2 more sources

RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of rapid SARS-CoV2 antigen testing in homeless shelters, San Francisco, 2021.

, 2022
RE-AIM framework to evaluate the implementation of rapid SARS-CoV2 antigen testing in homeless shelters, San Francisco, 2021.
Elizabeth Imbert (10767470), Andrés Aranda-Díaz (8363445), Jamie Moore (3487913), Dave Graham-Squire (12225052), Sarah Strieff (12225049), Jennifer L. Evans (5089295), Jonathan Fuchs (555350), Margaret A. Handley (8627586), Willi McFarland (211334), Margot Kushel (12225055)   +9 more
core   +1 more source

The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time

American Journal of Public Health, 2013
We provided a synthesis of use, summarized key issues in applying, and highlighted exemplary applications in the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. We articulated key RE-AIM criteria by reviewing the published literature from 1999 to 2010 in several databases to describe the application and reporting on
Bridget, Gaglio, Jo Ann, Shoup, Russell E, Glasgow   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Planning for Implementation Success Using RE-AIM and CFIR Frameworks: A Qualitative Study [PDF]

Frontiers in Public Health, 2020
Background: RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) dissemination and implementation frameworks define theory-based domains associated with the adoption, implementation and maintenance of evidence-based interventions.
King, Diane K., Shoup, Jo Ann, Raebel, Marsha A., Anderson, Courtney B., Wagner, Nicole M., Ritzwoller, Debra P., Bender, Bruce G.   +6 more
openaire   +3 more sources

RE-AIM implementation evaluation framework of the mass testing event intervention March-April 2021 in two predominantly Latino, low-income communities in Northern California.

, 2022
RE-AIM implementation evaluation framework of the mass testing event intervention March-April 2021 in two predominantly Latino, low-income communities in Northern California.
Gabriel Chamie (310924), Omar Carrera (14019413), Susana Rojas (723230), Yolanda Oviedo (14019404), Manuel J. Alvarado (14019416), Claudia G. Corchado (14019419), Patric Prado (14019401), Irene de Leon (14019428), Tatiana Vizcaíno (14019407), Maria-Elena De Trinidad Young (14019437), Diane V. Havlir (8374815), Irene H. Yen (14019440), Arturo Durazo (14019434), Carina Arechiga (14019410), Kesia K. Garibay (14019431), Joe DeRisi (7154), Carina Marquez (623638), Marilyn Mochel (14019425), Kara Marson (7047053), John Sauceda (6523934), Monica Gomez (14019422), Maya Petersen (780730)   +21 more
core   +1 more source

Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adaptations Across Four Diverse Health Systems Interventions

Frontiers in Public Health, 2018
BackgroundMany health outcomes and implementation science studies have demonstrated the importance of tailoring evidence-based care interventions to local context to improve fit.
Borsika A. Rabin, Borsika A. Rabin, Borsika A. Rabin, Borsika A. Rabin, Marina McCreight, Catherine Battaglia, Catherine Battaglia, Roman Ayele, Roman Ayele, Robert E. Burke, Robert E. Burke, Paul L. Hess, Paul L. Hess, Joseph W. Frank, Joseph W. Frank, Russell E. Glasgow, Russell E. Glasgow, Russell E. Glasgow   +17 more
doaj   +1 more source