Results 291 to 300 of about 607,703 (364)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Disagreement, Skepticism, and Begging the Question
International Journal for the Study of SkepticismIn this paper, I examine Thomas Kelly’s account of the epistemic significance of bias presented in Bias: A Philosophical Study. Kelly draws a parallel between the skeptical threat from bias and the skeptical threat from disagreement, and crafts a ...
Jonathan Matheson
semanticscholar +1 more source
Resolvable vs. Irresolvable Disagreement
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact., 2018Crowdsourced classification of data typically assumes that objects can be unambiguously classified into categories. In practice, many classification tasks are ambiguous due to various forms of disagreement.
M. Schaekermann +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Consensus, Disagreement, and the Criteria of Authenticity
Journal for the Study of the Historical JesusRecent scholarship has challenged the use of the so-called ‘criteria of authenticity’ in historical Jesus studies. One common argument draws attention to the fact that those who employ the criteria have produced an abundance of radically incompatible ...
Joel Archer
semanticscholar +1 more source
REASONABLE DOUBT AND DISAGREEMENT
Legal Theory, 2017ABSTRACTThe right to trial by jury and the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt are two of the most fundamental commitments of American criminal law. This article asks how the two are related, that is, whether disagreement among jurors implies anything about whether the beyond a reasonable doubt standard has been satisfied: Does the due ...
openaire +1 more source
Crowd vs. Expert: What Can Relevance Judgment Rationales Teach Us About Assessor Disagreement?
Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2018While crowdsourcing offers a low-cost, scalable way to collect relevance judgments, lack of transparency with remote crowd work has limited understanding about the quality of collected judgments. In prior work, we showed a variety of benefits from asking
Mucahid Kutlu +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Scholastic Approaches to Reasonable Disagreement
2021The scholastic controversy on probable opinions in the seventeenth century was one of the most extensive and acrimonious debates of the early modern era. Historiography has treated it as a quarrel over moral casuistry, but this underestimates its import. The scholastic preoccupation with the ‘use of opinions’ should be understood as
openaire +1 more source
Reasonable Disagreement and Distributive Justice
The Journal of Value Inquiry, 2001Etude de la theorie internationale de la justice developpee par J. Rawls a partir de la notion de desaccord raisonnable, qui s'oppose a l'ideal de la justice distributive. Distinguant le contexte mondial du contexte domestique, l'A. montre que la theorie internationale liberale de Rawls contredit ses engagements egalitaristes.
openaire +1 more source
Moral Disagreement and Reason-Giving
2021Abstract According to practical expressivism, moral disagreement is a species of disagreement in attitude whereby agents have moral commitments that advocate incompatible policies of action and reaction. This follows from a unified general account of disagreement as involving mental states that cannot collectively fulfil their ...
openaire +1 more source
Reasonable Religious Disagreements
2007Abstract A few years ago I co-taught a course called “Rationality, Relativism, and Religion” to undergraduates majoring in either philosophy or religion. Many of the students, especially the religion majors, displayed a pleasantly tolerant attitude.
openaire +1 more source