Results 21 to 30 of about 397,237 (311)
Reward does not modulate forgetting in free recall tests
Learning & Memory, 2022 Reward is thought to attenuate forgetting through the automatic effect of dopamine on hippocampal memory traces. Here we report a conceptual replication of previous results where we did not observe this effect of reward. Participants encoded eight lists of pictures and recalled picture content immediately or the next day.
Hellerstedt, Robin, Talmi, Deborah
openaire +2 more sources
Effectiveness of immediate vs. delayed recall in detecting invalid performance in coached and uncoached simulators: Results of two experimental studies [PDF]
Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 2021 Objective: Two experimental studies were conducted to compare the ability of immediate and delayed recall indicators to discriminate between performances of simulators and full-effort clinical and nonclinical participants.
Iulia Crișan +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Cognitive Factors Affecting Free Recall, Cued Recall, and Recognition Tasks in Alzheimer’s Disease
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra, 2012 Background/Aims: Our aim was to identify cognitive factors affecting free recall, cued recall, and recognition tasks in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Subjects: We recruited 349 consecutive AD patients who attended a memory clinic. Methods: Each
Takashi Yamagishi +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2014 Aims: This pilot study sought to determine whether the Malayalam adaptation of Addenbrooke′s Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) can effectively identify patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) and the impact of measures of learning and free ...
Ramshekhar Menon +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2019 Performance on recall tests improves through childhood and adolescence, in part due to structural maturation of the medial temporal cortex. Although partly different processes support successful recall over shorter vs. longer intervals, recall is usually
Anders M. Fjell +6 more
doaj +1 more source
Context-Dependent Memory of Motor Sequences
Journal of Cognition, 2021 To examine influences of context changes between encoding and retrieval of motor sequences, we varied a number of encoding and retrieval features in a two lists approach.
Markus Schmidt +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure [PDF]
Memory & Cognition, 2019 The primary and convergent retrieval (PCR) model assumes that the act of successful recall not only boosts associations between the item and retrieval cues but additionally strengthens associations within the item (i.e., between the features of an item), speeding the rate of information retrieval from memory.
William J. Hopper, David E. Huber
openaire +3 more sources
Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: The serial nature of recall and the effect of test expectancy [PDF]
Memory & Cognition, 2008 In two experiments, we examined the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall (ISR), using a within-subjects (Experiment 1) and a between-subjects (Experiment 2) design. In both experiments, participants read aloud lists of eight words and were precued or postcued to respond using free recall or ISR. The serial position curves were U-
Bhatarah, Parveen +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
Multiple-instance-learning-based detection of coeliac disease in histological whole-slide images
Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2022 We present a multiple-instance-learning-based scheme for detecting coeliac disease, an autoimmune disorder affecting the intestine, in histological whole-slide images (WSIs) of duodenal biopsies.
J. Denholm +11 more
doaj +1 more source
Characteristics of the quick repeat-recall test (Q-RRT)
International Journal of Audiology, 2023 To determine the reliability and validity of the Quick Repeat-Recall Test (Q-RRT). Within-subject repeated measures. Participants completed the Q-RRT at a speech level of 75 dB SPL in 2 noise configurations at signal-to-noise ratios of 5, 10, and 15 dB in a counterbalanced order, along with the full-RRT.
Francis Kuk +2 more
openaire +2 more sources