Results 131 to 140 of about 639,028 (243)

Relationship between objective and subjective refraction measurements in patients with mild keratoconus. [PDF]

Int J Ophthalmol
Khorrami-Nejad M, Kamil Dakhil A, Hashemian H, Sadeghi M, Yousefi R, Narooie-Noori F.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Atmospheric Refraction [PDF]

, 1873
Jason D. Everett
openalex   +1 more source

The influence of orthokeratology on peripheral refraction during accommodation. [PDF]

BMC Ophthalmol
Li Z, Jin X, Gui M, Zhang X, Guo X, Pan T, Wang Y.   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

IV. A letter from the Rev. Nevil Maskelyne, A. M. Fellow of Trinity College, in the University of Cambridge, and F. R. S. to the Rev. Dr. Birch, Secretary to the Royal Society; containing a theorem of the aberration of the rays of light refracted through a lens, on account of the imperfection of the spherical figure [PDF]

openalex   +1 more source

Enhanced P-wave velocity imaging by marine airgun-source seismic surveys with distributed acoustic sensing. [PDF]

Sci Rep
Fukushima S, Shinohara M, Yamada T, Hino R, Azuma R, Ito Y, Yamashita Y, Takano H.   +7 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Atmospheric Refraction [PDF]

, 1922
T. Y. BAKER
openalex   +1 more source

Autorefraction versus subjective refraction in high astigmatism. [PDF]

Int J Ophthalmol
Kangari H, Hashemi H, Rahmani S, Ahmadian E, Yekta A, Khabazkhoob M.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

LXV. A repetition of Fizeau's experiment on the change produced by the earth's motion on the rotation of a refracted ray [PDF]

, 1905
D. B. Brace
openalex   +1 more source

Perfect anomalous refraction metasurfaces empowered half-space optical beam scanning. [PDF]

Nat Commun
He T, Li D, Li C, Liang H, Feng C, Zhu J, Xie L, Dong S, Shi Y, Dun X, Wei Z, Wang Z, Cheng X.   +12 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines [Corrigendum]

Clinical Ophthalmology
Arnold R, Silbert D, Modjesky H. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:489—505. The authors have advised that Table 3 on page 497 is incorrect. In the SPOT section, <4y, sensitive row, Cylinder column, the value should be ≥2.75 instead of 3.75 ...
Arnold R, Silbert D, Modjesky H
doaj