Results 171 to 180 of about 3,642 (214)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2000
Abstract Gettier’s seminal article on justified true belief (Gettier (1963)) forced a re thinking of the conditions of knowledge. So-called external factors and analyses came to the fore. The distinction between knowledge and mere true opinion turns on the way in which the belief was formed and how it is sustained.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Gettier’s seminal article on justified true belief (Gettier (1963)) forced a re thinking of the conditions of knowledge. So-called external factors and analyses came to the fore. The distinction between knowledge and mere true opinion turns on the way in which the belief was formed and how it is sustained.
openaire +1 more source
Normal Circumstances Reliabilism
Philosophical Topics, 2017Alvin Goldman's paper "What Is Justified Belief" and his book Epistemology and Cognition pioneered reliabilist theories of epistemic justifiedness. In light of counterexamples to necessity (demon worlds, brains-in-vats) and counterexamples to sufficiency (Norman the clairvoyant, Mr.
openaire +1 more source
Synthese, 1993
Contre le scepticisme de Hume concernant la legitimite de la connaissance inductive, l'A. propose une solution fiabiliste au probleme de la justification de l'induction, qui autorise la these de la ...
openaire +1 more source
Contre le scepticisme de Hume concernant la legitimite de la connaissance inductive, l'A. propose une solution fiabiliste au probleme de la justification de l'induction, qui autorise la these de la ...
openaire +1 more source
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1996
How can we ever find out whether our psychological processes are reliable? According to many reliabilists-e.g. Alston (1989a), Goldman (1986, pp. 118, 393-94), Papineau (1992; 1993, pp. 154-70), and Van Cleve' (1984)there is no problem: We just use our psychological processes and then arrive at the belief that these very same processes are reliable. If
openaire +1 more source
How can we ever find out whether our psychological processes are reliable? According to many reliabilists-e.g. Alston (1989a), Goldman (1986, pp. 118, 393-94), Papineau (1992; 1993, pp. 154-70), and Van Cleve' (1984)there is no problem: We just use our psychological processes and then arrive at the belief that these very same processes are reliable. If
openaire +1 more source
Process Reliabilism, Virtue Reliabilism, and the Value of Knowledge
The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2007AbstractThe value problem for knowledge is the problem of explaining why knowledge is cognitively more valuable than mere true belief. If an account of the nature of knowledge is unable to solve the value problem for knowledge, this provides a pro tanto reason to reject that account.
openaire +1 more source
Against transglobal reliabilism
Philosophical Studies, 2013David Henderson and Terry Horgan argue that doxastic epistemic justification requires the transglobal reliability of the belief-forming process. Transglobal reliability is reliability across a wide range of experientially possible global environments.
openaire +1 more source
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2006
In this article I examine several issues concerning reliabilism and deflationism. I critique Alvin Goldman's account of the key differences between correspondence and deflationary theories and his claim that reliabilism can be combined only with those truth theories that maintain a commitment to truthmakers.
openaire +1 more source
In this article I examine several issues concerning reliabilism and deflationism. I critique Alvin Goldman's account of the key differences between correspondence and deflationary theories and his claim that reliabilism can be combined only with those truth theories that maintain a commitment to truthmakers.
openaire +1 more source
Process Reliabilism and Cartesian Scepticism
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1996I will be concerned here with a theory of doxastic justification that was first proposed by Alvin Goldman in 1979.1 This theory, which is generally known as process reliabilism, has in recent years gone through a number of changes, and each change has added significantly to its complexity and subtlety.
openaire +1 more source