Results 61 to 70 of about 3,642 (214)
Abstract I argue for a pluralist theory of moral standing, on which both welfare subjectivity and autonomy can confer moral status. I argue that autonomy does not entail welfare subjectivity, but can ground moral standing in its absence. Although I highlight the existence of plausible views on which autonomy entails phenomenal consciousness, I ...
Andreas L. Mogensen
wiley +1 more source
Non‐ideal epistemic rationality
Abstract I develop a broadly reliabilist theory of non‐ideal epistemic rationality and argue that if it is correct we should reject the recently popular idea that the standards of non‐ideal epistemic rationality are mere social conventions.
Nick Hughes
wiley +1 more source
Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation
The paper deals with the relation between abduction and inference to the best explanation (IBE). A heuristic and a normative interpretation of IBE are distinguished. Besides, two different normative interpretations —those vindicated by I.
Valeriano Iranzo
doaj +1 more source
Reliabilism, Induction and Scepticism [PDF]
Book ...
openaire +1 more source
Virtue Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism Justification [PDF]
This research work titled, “Virtue epistemology: Internalism and Externalism Justification” attempts to give a succinct analysis of the justification of our knowledge. It rigorously scrutinizes the sources of our knowledge claim.
Akwaji, Agabi Gabriel +1 more
core +1 more source
Abstract When one is intentionally doing something, one represents that thing as a goal to be accomplished. One represents it practically. How should we characterize this practical representation further? In this paper, I argue that when one is intentionally doing something, one's representation of it as a goal to be accomplished must also be knowledge
Alec Hinshelwood
wiley +1 more source
The factivity of practical knowledge
Abstract Anscombean accounts claim that intentional action is essentially characterized by an agent's practical knowledge of what she is doing. Such accounts are threatened by cases in which an agent seemingly fails to know what she is doing because of a mistake in the performance. It thus seems that such accounts are incompatible with the factivity of
Dawa Ometto, Niels van Miltenburg
wiley +1 more source
Is evidence‐based practice justified?—A philosophical critique
Abstract Background Evidence‐based practice is the principle governing a range of healthcare practices and beyond. However, it has suffered from a lack of philosophical rigour. This paper sets out to analyse the epistemological basis of evidence‐based practice. Method The paper uses a conceptual analysis.
Henrik Berg
wiley +1 more source
Collaborative memory knowledge: A distributed reliabilist perspective [PDF]
Collaborative remembering, in which two or more individuals cooperate to remember together, is an ordinary occurrence. Ordinary though it may be, it challenges traditional understandings of remembering as a cognitive process unfolding within a single ...
Arango-Munoz, Santiago +1 more
core +3 more sources
Abstract Naturalism, construed as the idea that philosophy should be continuous with science, is a highly influential view. Its consequences for epistemology, however, are rather odd. Many believe that naturalized epistemology allows eschewing traditional skeptical challenges.
Marc Jiménez‐Rolland
wiley +1 more source

