Results 161 to 170 of about 710,866 (212)

3. The Supreme Court and Religious Liberty

, 1990
openaire   +2 more sources

Perceptions of Abortion and Sexual and Reproductive Health in Chilean Medical and Midwifery Education: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR Res Protoc
Casas-Becerra L, Ramm A, Pérez B, Kaune H, Carrasco-Portiño M, Montero A, Bustos-Ibarra C, Castro-Arias H, López-Labarca C, Reyes-Torres L.   +9 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Awe tout court: Neither Religious nor Spiritual

Annali di studi religiosi
openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Religious Practices at Court

2020
Abstract John oversaw a surprisingly active religious life at court that nonetheless failed to create an aura of pious kingship for him. Despite his reputation for impiety, recent work has shown that John carried out the religious practices expected of kings in his day, such as honouring saints’ relics, giving alms, and supporting ...
openaire   +1 more source

Religious Regulation and the Courts

2004
Throughout the 1990s there was a growing turmoil over interpreting the First Amendment’s free exercise clause on religion. The 1990s opened with the U.S. Supreme Court’s controversial ruling on Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith (494 U.S. 872, 1990)—a ruling that many contended dispensed with the compelling state interest test previously used by ...
John Wybraniec, Roger Finke
openaire   +1 more source

Religious Plurality at Princely Courts

Early modern European monarchies legitimized their rule through dynasty and religion, and ideally the divine right of the ruler corresponded with the confession of the territory. It has thus been assumed that at princely courts only a single confession was present.
  +4 more sources

How Should Courts Approach Religious Litigation?

2018
This chapter suggests that the proposed theory of human rights has important implications for those who are involved in religious litigation, both on the religious side of the debates, for those on the human rights side of the debates, and for the courts which need to adjudicate such disputes.
openaire   +1 more source

State Legal Pluralism and Religious Courts

2020
Abstract In a seminal 1986 article, John Griffiths argues that state legal pluralism, as opposed to state/nonstate legal pluralism, is “weak” legal pluralism. State legal pluralism refers to the coexistence of and interaction of distinctive legal systems which are nonetheless administered by the state; that is, the coexistence of state ...
openaire   +1 more source