Results 1 to 10 of about 3,787,231 (262)
Reforming research assessment. [PDF]
Elife, 2013 It is time for the research community to rethink how the outputs of scientific research are evaluated and, as the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment makes clear, this should involve replacing the journal impact factor with a broad range of more meaningful approaches.
Schekman R, Patterson M.
europepmc +5 more sources
No shortcuts for research assessment. [PDF]
Mol Biol Cell, 2013 Funding agencies, journal editors, and hiring and promotion committees expend large amounts of time and resources deciding how to allocate precious funds, what science to publish, and which scientists deserve a job or promotion because of their scientific contributions.
Bertuzzi S, Drubin DG.
europepmc +3 more sources
Editorial: Quality and quantity in research assessment: Examining the merits of metrics [PDF]
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2022 Maziar Montazerian +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Assessing Commensality in Research [PDF]
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021 This scoping review focuses on the assessment of commensality in research and attempts to identify used methods for performing research on commensality. It reflects a multidisciplinary research field and draws on findings from Web of Science Core Collection, up to April 2019. The empirical material consisted of 61 studies, whereof most were qualitative
Henrik Scander +2 more
openaire +5 more sources
Libraries and the REF: how do librarians contribute to research excellence?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2020 Librarians support research in a wide variety of ways. However, librarians may not always receive recognition for the valuable contributions they make to the research life cycle or research environments.
Dominic Walker
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2020 Scholarly organizations bring together experts to move forward specific areas of scientific endeavor. More than 5,000 scholarly societies exist world-wide yet little is known about the composition, evolution, and collaboration of experts within these ...
Zorina S. Galis +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Changing how we evaluate research is difficult, but not impossible
eLife, 2020 The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was published in 2013 and described how funding agencies, institutions, publishers, organizations that supply metrics, and individual researchers could better evaluate the outputs of scientific ...
Anna Hatch, Stephen Curry
doaj +1 more source
Assessing the quality of research [PDF]
BMJ, 2004 Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?
Glasziou, P +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Implementing a "publish, then review" model of publishing
eLife, 2020 From July 2021 eLife will only review manuscripts already published as preprints, and will focus its editorial process on producing public reviews to be posted alongside the preprints.
Michael B Eisen +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Report on Methodological Quality Assessment of Primary Care and General Practice Research in China in 2021: Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research Section [PDF]
Zhongguo quanke yixueBackground General practice has significant interdisciplinary characteristics, both qualitative research and mixed methods research are applicable to scientific research in this field.
Quality Assessment Group for Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research of Chinese General Practice
doaj +1 more source