Results 231 to 240 of about 38,763 (257)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Managing research data in multi-organisational, multi-omics environments is increasingly complex yet most existing systems are built for institutions, not researchers. REDMANE (REsearch Data Management & ANalysis Environment) is a lightweight, researcher-focused ecosystem that addresses this critical gap.
openaire +1 more source
openaire +1 more source
An overview of real‐world data sources for oncology and considerations for research
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2022Lynne Penberthy +2 more
exaly
This dataset includes information on quality control and data management of researchers and data curators from a social science organization. Four data curators and 24 researchers provided responses for the study. Data collection techniques, data processing strategies, data storage and preservation, metadata standards, data sharing procedures, and the ...
openaire +1 more source
openaire +1 more source
2017
Text data is ubiquitous. This type of data is not limited to organizational reports anymore and can come from a wide variety of sources (e.g. Internet Data). Even though beneficial, the traditional quantitative text analysis techniques simply fail to deal with the size and the dimension of the data.
Bayat, Ali, Kawalek, Peter
openaire +1 more source
Text data is ubiquitous. This type of data is not limited to organizational reports anymore and can come from a wide variety of sources (e.g. Internet Data). Even though beneficial, the traditional quantitative text analysis techniques simply fail to deal with the size and the dimension of the data.
Bayat, Ali, Kawalek, Peter
openaire +1 more source
Innovations in research and clinical care using patient‐generated health data
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2020H S L Jim +2 more
exaly
This editorial explores the transformative potential of AI, specifically machine learning, in the realm of medical research, particularly focusing on systematic reviews, data organisation, and management. Traditional methods of conducting systematic reviews are often time-consuming and labor-intensive, typically taking between 12 to 24 months. AI tools
openaire +1 more source
openaire +1 more source
Evolving standards of care and new challenges in the management of HER2‐positive breast cancer
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2020Grace M Choong +2 more
exaly

