Results 181 to 190 of about 19,530 (226)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
On “intent” in research misconduct
Accountability in ResearchResearch misconduct, broadly defined as acts of fabrication, falsification and/or plagiarism, violate the value system of science, cost significant wastage of public resources, and in more extreme cases endanger research participants or members of the society at large. Determination of culpability in research misconduct requires establishment of intent
Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh, Bor Luen Tang
openaire +2 more sources
2009
Abstract Since the 1980s, well-publicized cases of research misconduct have increased public concerns about the integrity of research and stimulated responses from governments, research institutions, funding agencies, and journals. Surveys indicate that the prevalence of misconduct may be larger than many researchers would like to ...
Adil E. Shamoo, David B. Resnik
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Since the 1980s, well-publicized cases of research misconduct have increased public concerns about the integrity of research and stimulated responses from governments, research institutions, funding agencies, and journals. Surveys indicate that the prevalence of misconduct may be larger than many researchers would like to ...
Adil E. Shamoo, David B. Resnik
openaire +1 more source
Research misconduct: learning the lessons
The Lancet, 2006It is only with perverse nostalgia that I now hold the September, 2005, letter from Jon Sudbo. His letter accompanied a paper The Lancet published on October 15, 2005. It is the letter that prompted an expression of concern published on January 21, 2006. It is the letter that eventually led to a retraction notice being issued on February 4, 2006. Sudbo’
Magne, Nylenna, Richard, Horton
openaire +2 more sources
The definition of research misconduct should be stated in the abstract when reporting research on research misconduct [PDF]
Accountability in ResearchResearch integrity is the cornerstone for a reliable and trustworthy science. Research misconduct is classically defined as fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism. To be considered as such, the action must have been committed with the intent to mislead or deceive.
Rafael Dal-Ré, Ana Marušić
openaire +2 more sources
Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1990Substantial numbers of clinical trials are never reported in print, and among those that are, many are not reported in sufficient detail to enable judgments to be made about the validity of their results. Failure to publish an adequate account of a well-designed clinical trial is a form of scientific misconduct that can lead those caring for patients ...
openaire +2 more sources
The Role of Culture in Research Misconduct
Accountability in Research, 2003There seems to be a taboo against discussing the role culture or national origin might play in research misconduct. Still, some observers wonder why so many scientists representing foreign cultures are among those found guilty of misconduct. Even after examining the scant available data, whether foreign nationals are disproportionately represented ...
openaire +2 more sources
Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021Esmee Bordewijk +2 more
exaly