Results 221 to 230 of about 27,682 (271)

Research Misconduct

Clinical Radiology, 2003
Good research practice is important to the scientific community. An awareness of what constitutes poor practice is important. Various types of research misconduct are defined in this article. The extent of research misconduct in the field of radiology has been assessed by contacting five English language radiology journals.
Fiona J Gilbert
exaly   +3 more sources

Research misconduct in the UK

BMJ, 2012
Time to act Research misconduct can harm patients, distort the evidence base, misdirect research effort, waste funds, and damage public trust in science. Countries all over the developed world are now recognising the need to set up systems to deter, detect, and investigate research misconduct. Why does the United Kingdom have no plans to do the same?
Fiona, Godlee, Elizabeth, Wager
openaire   +2 more sources

Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct

Science and Engineering Ethics, 2009
A growing number of research misconduct cases handled by the Office of Research Integrity involve image manipulations. Manipulations may include simple image enhancements, misrepresenting an image as something different from what it is, and altering specific features of an image.
Debra Parrish, Bridget M. Noonan
openaire   +2 more sources

On “intent” in research misconduct

Accountability in Research
Research misconduct, broadly defined as acts of fabrication, falsification and/or plagiarism, violate the value system of science, cost significant wastage of public resources, and in more extreme cases endanger research participants or members of the society at large. Determination of culpability in research misconduct requires establishment of intent
Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh, Bor Luen Tang
openaire   +2 more sources

Research misconduct

open access: yesSociety, 1994
Lafollette, Marcel C.
openaire   +2 more sources

Misconduct in Research

2009
Abstract Since the 1980s, well-publicized cases of research misconduct have increased public concerns about the integrity of research and stimulated responses from governments, research institutions, funding agencies, and journals. Surveys indicate that the prevalence of misconduct may be larger than many researchers would like to ...
Adil E. Shamoo, David B. Resnik
openaire   +1 more source

Research misconduct: learning the lessons

The Lancet, 2006
It is only with perverse nostalgia that I now hold the September, 2005, letter from Jon Sudbo. His letter accompanied a paper The Lancet published on October 15, 2005. It is the letter that prompted an expression of concern published on January 21, 2006. It is the letter that eventually led to a retraction notice being issued on February 4, 2006. Sudbo’
Magne, Nylenna, Richard, Horton
openaire   +2 more sources

Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct

JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1990
Substantial numbers of clinical trials are never reported in print, and among those that are, many are not reported in sufficient detail to enable judgments to be made about the validity of their results. Failure to publish an adequate account of a well-designed clinical trial is a form of scientific misconduct that can lead those caring for patients ...
openaire   +2 more sources

The Role of Culture in Research Misconduct

Accountability in Research, 2003
There seems to be a taboo against discussing the role culture or national origin might play in research misconduct. Still, some observers wonder why so many scientists representing foreign cultures are among those found guilty of misconduct. Even after examining the scant available data, whether foreign nationals are disproportionately represented ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy