Results 231 to 240 of about 9,608 (265)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
The International journal of prosthodontics, 1991The recently developed dual-setting resin glass-ionomer cements are discussed, and the question of whether they are the true glass-ionomer cements is addressed. Their chemistry and properties are examined and compared with conventional glass-ionomer cements.
openaire +1 more source
Etching conditions for resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic brackets
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2002This study reports the tensile bond strength of orthodontic eyelets (RMO, Inc, Denver, Colo) bonded to human extracted teeth with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Fuji Ortho LC, GC America, Alsip, Ill) and various acid etchants (Etch-37 and All-Etch, Bisco, Schaumburg, Ill; Ultra Etch, 3M Unitek, St Paul, Minn) for enamel preparation ...
Rudolfo M, Valente +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Solubility of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
ASDC journal of dentistry for children, 1998Thirty standardized discs were fabricated from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer -3M) using three different powder/liquid ratios. All specimens were immediately weighed. Specimens were stored in artificial saliva for thirty days. Twice each day the specimens received a 30-min.
B M, Quackenbush, K J, Donly, T P, Croll
openaire +1 more source
Radiopacity of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements.
Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985), 1997This in vitro study compared the relative radiopacities of three commercially available resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer, Fuji II LC, and Photac-Fil), an experimental resin-modified glass-ionomer (V-66), two conventional glass-ionomers (ChemFil and Fuji Cap II), and amalgam (as the control).
S K, Sidhu +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Effects of aging on repair of resin‐modified glass–ionomer cements
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2000The effects of aging on the repair bond strengths of resin‐modified glass–ionomer cements after different methods of surface conditioning were studied. Surface conditioning methods included the following: maleic acid; maleic acid with resin application; polyacrylic acid; polyacrylic acid with resin application.
Yap, A.U.J., Lye, K.W., Sau, C.W.
openaire +2 more sources
Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin‐modified glass ionomer cements
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2006summary The bonding of resin‐modified glass ionomer cements to dentin remains a challenge in clinical routine. In an attempt to improve this property, different materials and techniques have been proposed. This study investigated the shear bond strength of resin‐modified glass ionomer cements (Vitremer, 3M/ESPE and Fuji II LC Improved, GC) to human ...
L, Wang +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: a comparison of water sorption characteristics
Biomaterials, 1996The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the amount of water absorbed by six commercially available resin-modified glass ionomer cements and to investigate the possible influence of time and resin content on water sorption. The materials evaluated included Variglass used as a restoration, base and liner; Fuji II LC; Fuji Liner; Vitrebond ...
openaire +2 more sources
Color stability of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Operative dentistry, 2002The color stability of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC) was investigated over six months using colorimetry. Five shades (A2, A3, A4, B3 and C4) were selected and 10 square specimens (7 mm wide and long, and 1.5 mm deep) were made for each shade using special grit molds.
Yap, A.U., Sim, C.P., Loganathan, V.
openaire +1 more source
Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars.
Swedish dental journal, 1999The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the 3-year performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars. A total of 174 class II restorations were placed in 85 children by 6 dentists. The restorations were evaluated during a 3-year period using slightly modified USPHS criteria (van Dijken 1986).
U H, Folkesson +2 more
openaire +1 more source

