Results 1 to 10 of about 5,589 (132)
The Reverse Talmud Rule for Bankruptcy Problems [PDF]
, 2008 We introduce a new solution for bankruptcy problems that satisfies weaker versions of the Exemption en Exclusion properties from the literature. Although the principles of Exclusion and Exemption are appealing, the specific conditions under which an agent receives its claim, respectively nothing, seem arbitrary and are inconsistent in the sense that ...
Rene van den Brink +2 more
openaire +8 more sources
Targeting inflammation to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a realistic clinical prospect? [PDF]
Br J Pharmacol, 2017 Data from basic science experiments is overwhelmingly supportive of the causal role of immune-inflammatory response(s) at the core of atherosclerosis, and therefore the theoretical potential to manipulate the inflammatory response to prevent ...
Welsh P +4 more
europepmc +4 more sources
Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims [PDF]
, 2016 We propose and study a new axiom, restricted endowment additivity, for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. This axiom requires that awards be additively decomposable with respect to the endowment whenever no agent’s claim is filled.
Harless, Patrick
core +1 more source
The Coiled Serpent of Argument: Reason, Authority, and Law in a Talmudic Tale [PDF]
, 2004 One of the most celebrated Talmudic parables begins with a remarkably dry legal issue debated among a group of rabbis. A modern reader should think of the rabbis as a collegial court, very much like a secular appellate court, because the purpose of their
Luban, David
core +2 more sources
, 2018 Logic in the Talmud is a ‘thematic compilation’ by Avi Sion. It collects in one volume essays that he has written on this subject in Judaic Logic (1995) and A Fortiori Logic (2013), in which traces of logic in the Talmud (the Mishna and Gemara) are ...
Sion, Avi
core
Lorenz comparisons of nine rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims [PDF]
Consider the following nine rules for adjudicating conflicting claims: the proportional, constrained equal awards, constrained equal losses, Talmud, Piniles’, constrained egalitarian, adjusted proportional, random arrival, and minimal overlap rules.
Kristof Bosmans, Luc Lauwers
core +3 more sources
Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims [PDF]
We define two families of rules to adjudicate conflicting claims. The first family contains the constrained equal awards, constrained equal losses, Talmud, and minimal overlap rules. The second family, which also contains the constrained equal awards and
William Thomson
core
On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency [PDF]
We consider the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims in the context of a variable population. A property of rules is "lifted" if whenever a rule satisfies it in the two-claimant case, and the rule is bilaterally consistent, it satisfies it for any ...
Toru Hokari, William Thomson
core
Convergence under Replication of Rules to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims [PDF]
We study the behavior of rules for the adjudication of con°icting claims when there are a large number of claimants with small claims. We model such situations by replicating some basic problem.
William Thomson, Youngsub Chun
core
Menorah Review (No. 62, Winter/Spring, 2005) [PDF]
, 2005 Tales to Engage -- The Study of The Holocaust And Its Discontents -- Jews Courageous -- Thinking Heart of A Concentration Camp: The Spiritual Journey of A Young Woman in Holland Under Nazi Occupation -- Great Russian-Jewish Historians -- Children\u27s ...
core +1 more source