Results 281 to 290 of about 210,800 (322)

Use of a Trephine to Extract a Fractured Corail Femoral Stem During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Tips From Our Case Report. [PDF]

Cureus
Singh A, Gandavaram S, Patel K, Herlekar D.   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in hip arthroplasty STATE OF THE ART AND THE FUTURE

, 2012
Bragdon CR, Furuya K, Millar NL, Mittelmeier H, Nizard RS, Park YS, Riska EB, Salzer M, Sariali E, Vendittoli P, Wagner H, Winter M   +11 more
core   +1 more source

The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings. [PDF]

Int Orthop
Meriem S, Antoniadis A, Palazzuolo M, Wegrzyn J.   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Impact of fixation method on femoral bone loss: a retrospective evaluation of stem loosening in first-time revision total hip arthroplasty among two hundred and fifty five patients. [PDF]

Int Orthop
Wagener N, Pumberger M, Hardt S.
europepmc   +1 more source

Does Using Highly Porous Tantalum in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduce the Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [PDF]

Arthroplast Today
Mirghaderi P, Eshraghi N, Sheikhbahaei E, Razzaghof M, Roustai-Geraylow K, Pouramini A, Eraghi MM, Kafi F, Javad Mortazavi SM.   +8 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty [PDF]

AORN Journal, 2002
ABSTRACTEndoscopic visualization and pneumatically‐powered ballistic chisels that can be used to remove cement and cementless prostheses are recent developmental improvements for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Use of these new tools facilitates the revision procedure, reduces tissue trauma, and may reduce surgical time.
Gerhard E. Maale, Cynthia Drake, Marcia Ace   +2 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982
In this review, 110 hips in 107 patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty at The Hospital for Special Surgery and the Robert B. Brigham Hospital. The minimum follow-up period was two years (average, 3.4 years). Failures of the original total hip arthroplasties were due to loosening of the femoral component (44 hips), loosening of both ...
Philip D. Wilson, Eduardo A. Salvati, Chitranjan S. Ranawat, Robert Poss, Clement B. Sledge, Paul M. Pellicci   +5 more
openaire   +5 more sources

Revision total hip arthroplasty.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1985
Two hundred and ten hips in 206 patients who had an initial total hip arthroplasty performed at the Mayo Clinic between 1969 and 1978 required revision of the arthroplasty at the Mayo Clinic for reasons other than infection. One hundred and sixty-two of the patients (166 hips) were followed both clinically and roentgenographically for two years or more.
Duane M. Ilstrup, Brian F. Kavanagh, Robert H. Fitzgerald   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Instrumentation for the Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984
Revisions of total hip arthroplasties are destined to overload operating schedules in the next decade. An analysis of present trends and highlights of some unresolved problems reveal the urgent need to develop specific jigs and instrumentation to make revision surgery easier on both patient and surgeon.
McClelland Cj, Mollan Ra
openaire   +3 more sources

The results of revision of total hip arthroplasty

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1979
The results of 140 total hip revision procedures for "non-septic" loosening, dislocation, and fracture of the femoral stem or shaft have been personally reviewed and rated by the Harris method. The minimum follow-up period was six months: thirty-three (24 per cent) showed excellent or good results, seventy-two (51 per cent) showed fair or poor results.
Welsh Rp, Cameron Hu, Bailey Wh, GA Hunter   +3 more
openaire   +3 more sources