Results 311 to 320 of about 50,165 (354)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
2011Consider revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA) when patient has pain or functional disability due to: Implant loosening Implant fracture Advanced bearing surface wear Periprosthetic fracture Infection Recurrent dislocation - Implant mal-positioned Do not proceed to revision unless you have a clear idea about patient’s cause of ...
Vassilios S. Nikolaou, John Antoniou
openaire +1 more source
Revision of Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1986Extension of infection down the medulla of the femur to the supracondylar region may occur in cases of chronic infected total hip arthroplasty. Because this cannot always be identified before operation, the femur should be reamed and flushed proximally from the lateral condyle in all cases where there is suspicion of infection around the femoral ...
F A, Weber, E E, Lautenbach
openaire +2 more sources
Revision of Mueller Total Hip Arthroplasties
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1981Experience with 65 revisions of Mueller total hip arthroplasties and a minimum of two years follow-up on 32 revised total hips showed that the results appear to be poor in a significant number (22%) of patients: 18% required additional surgery. Revision of total hip arthroplasties with recementing of one or both components carries a significant risk of
T, Hoogland +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Total Hip Revision Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982The results of revision total hip arthroplasty, with or without sepsis, are compared in a review of the recent literature. In 661 total hip revisions without sepsis, there is an overall 54% excellent/good/satisfactory rate and a 12% infection rate. Of 1063 total hip revisions in the presence of or after sepsis, there is an overall success rate of 73 ...
E T, James, G A, Hunter, H U, Cameron
openaire +2 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 2003Revision total hip arthroplasty is a complex surgical procedure that frequently requires high levels of hospital resources. The purpose of the current study was to report the actual costs and reimbursement to the hospital for a stratified group of patients having revision total hip arthroplasty based on a severity index.
John F, Crowe +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1983ABSTRACT When asked to review another publication on the revision of the total hip replacement, I was concerned that it would be more of what fills our literature to date. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty is a pleasant surprise.The first three chapters should be absolute reading for all orthopedists.
openaire +1 more source
Revision Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty
Orthopaedic Nursing, 2005For thousands of patients with advanced degenerative joint disease, total joint arthroplasty provides improved function, decreased pain, and the opportunity to resume a more active lifestyle (Drake, Ace, & Maale, 2002). Although hip and knee replacements are both successful interventions for degenerative joint conditions, complications may arise that ...
openaire +2 more sources
Economics of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1995A study was undertaken to determine the relative work input and risk involved in doing primary total hip arthroplasty compared with revision total hip arthroplasty. These data were compared with the reimbursement to the hospital and to the surgeon. Parameters examined included operative time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, use of bone graft, and ...
openaire +2 more sources
Pelvic Discontinuity in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty*
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 1999Pelvic discontinuity is a distinct form of bone loss, occurring in association with total hip arthroplasty, in which the superior aspect of the pelvis is separated from the inferior aspect because of bone loss or a fracture through the acetabulum. The purpose of this study was to describe the population of patients who are at risk for this condition ...
D J, Berry +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Revision of Aseptic Loose Total Hip Arthroplasties
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1982Sixty-six patients were revised for aseptic loosening of their conventional hip arthroplasties; follow-up periods ranged from one to nine years. In comparing them with an overall conventional arthroplasty series, there was a higher failure rate with dysplasia and post-traumatic patients, and a lower incidence in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid patients ...
H C, Amstutz +3 more
openaire +2 more sources