Results 321 to 330 of about 50,165 (354)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1987In 29 consecutive failed total hip arthroplasties revised during a 15-month period, cement fixation was used in 14 and cementless fixation in 11. A combination of the two techniques was used in four patients. Analysis of the indications for one or the other fixation type showed that the quality of bone stock and the location of bone deficiency were the
openaire +2 more sources
Component Selection in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 2014Component selection for revision total hip arthroplasty is important for creating a stable hip, providing offset to maximize joint mechanics, and restoring appropriate leg lengths. On the femoral side, fully porous coated stems, modular tapered stems, and proximal femoral replacements can be used depending on the level of bone loss. For the acetabulum,
Antonia F, Chen, William J, Hozack
openaire +2 more sources
Dislocation requiring revision in total hip arthroplasty
Archives of Orthopaedic and Traumatic Surgery, 1979In a study of 141 hip revisions seventeen were found to be due to recurrent dislocation. Thirteen cases occurred immediately postoperatively and four more than two years following surgery. In the early cases component malposition was found to be the commonest cause of dislocation. Revision resulted in only 40% acceptable results.
H U, Cameron, G A, Hunter, R P, Welsh
openaire +2 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Acetabular Component
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1995Intermediate and long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty performed with the use of a cemented acetabular component have been disappointing, with high rates of radiographic and clinical failure. Other methods of acetabular revision involving the use of threaded cups and bipolar implants have also met with high failure rates.
, Petrera, , Rubash
openaire +2 more sources
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Femoral Component
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1995The initial results with cemented femoral revision stems were disappointing, with high early loosening rates. The application of second-generation cementing techniques improved results markedly, with loosening rates of 10% at 10 years in a number of series.
, Barrack, , Folgueras
openaire +2 more sources
Revision total hip arthroplasty
The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1993James C. Zmolek, Lawrence D. Dorr
openaire +2 more sources