Results 161 to 170 of about 19,363 (203)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Reproductive Performance of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys
The Condor, 1989Sur deux annees et grâce a des observations directes et a des captures suivies de recensements, le pourcentage de nidification, leur succes et les patterns temporels d'initiation du nid sont evalues pour etudier la dynamique d'une population introduite de Meleagris gallopavo intermedia en milieu ripicole.
Schmutz, Joel A., Braun, Clait E.
openaire +1 more source
Survival, harvest, and population size of Rio Grande wild turkeys in Texas
The Journal of Wildlife Management, 2022AbstractUse of band recovery data combined with estimates of hunter harvests provides a foundation for estimation of abundance and population trajectory for a variety of wildlife species. We banded 3,141 Rio Grande wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia) during 2015–2021 and used band‐recovery data to assess annual survival and harvest, and to ...
Byron R. Buckley +3 more
openaire +1 more source
HEMATOZOAN PARASITES OF RIO GRANDE WILD TURKEYS FROM SOUTHERN TEXAS
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 1988One hundred twenty-three of 300 blood samples (41%) taken from Rio Grande wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia) from three locations in southern Texas (Welder Wildlife Refuge, Chaparrosa Ranch, and Campo Alegre Ranch) and subinoculated into domestic broad-breasted white turkey poults were positive for a Plasmodium (Novyella) sp.
M D, Castle +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Invertebrate Abundance at Rio Grande Wild Turkey Brood Locations
The Journal of Wildlife Management, 2007ABSTRACT Abundance of Rio Grande wild turkeys ( Meleagris gallopavo intermedia ) has declined in the southeastern Edwards Plateau (EP) of Texas, USA, whereas abundance has remained stable in the northwestern EP.
CHARLES J. RANDEL +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Renesting by Rio Grande Wild Turkeys after Brood Loss
The Journal of Wildlife Management, 1993Although the importance of renesting by wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) after clutch loss has been documented, the contribution to turkey populations of renesting after brood loss is unknown. Consequently, we examined renesting capacity of an introduced Rio Grande wild turkey (M. g.
Thomas W. Keegan, John A. Crawford
openaire +1 more source
Genetic Structure of Reintroduced Rio Grande Wild Turkeys in Kansas
The Journal of Wildlife Management, 1995We investigated genetic structure within and among wintering flocks of Rio Grande wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo intermedia) to assess the importance of local individual flocks to managing and conserving genetic diversity of the wild turkey. We documented genetic differences among 4 local flocks of female turkeys reintroduced in south-central Kansas.
Olin E. Rhodes +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Rio Grande Wild Turkey Habitat Selection in the Southern Great Plains
The Journal of Wildlife Management, 2007ABSTRACT We recorded telemetry locations from 1,129 radiotagged turkeys ( Meleagris gallopavo intermedia ) on 4 study areas in the Texas Panhandle and southwestern Kansas, USA, from 2000 to 2004.
GALON I. HALL +8 more
openaire +1 more source
Nest Habitat Use of Rio Grande Wild Turkeys
1989(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.
Schmutz, Joel A +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Evaluation of Portable Infrared Cameras for Detecting Rio Grande Wild Turkeys
Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2006Observing nocturnal, cryptic, highly mobile, or elusive wildlife in the field is difficult. Precise abundance estimates are necessary to make management decisions. Numerous methods have been examined to estimate wild turkey abundance with limited success.
SHAWN L. LOCKE +4 more
openaire +1 more source
The relationship of Rio Grande wild turkey distributions to roads
Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2005Wildlife Society Bulletin 2005, 33(2):745–748 Peer refereed Distance sampling from roads is a common population estimation technique used for many wildlife species (Brennan and Block 1986, DeYoung and Priebe 1987, Borralho et al. 1996, Dahlheim et al. 2000). A critical assumption of the distance sampling technique is that the distribution of animals is
Matthew J. Butler +4 more
openaire +1 more source

