Results 181 to 190 of about 2,234 (196)

Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from different modifications of glass ionomer dental restorative material in primary teeth at different time intervals: An ex vivo study. [PDF]

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res
Mehta V, Srivastava N, Ali Chaudhry S, Rana V.   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Comparative Evaluation of Hardness in Ceramic Reinforced, Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement.

J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Shivanna S, Roshan S, Sameera S, Sivakumar M, Ravi M, Ram SL.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance in Endodontically Treated Teeth: An Analysis of Different Restorative Materials.

J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Chaudhary S, Mishra P, Singh SK, Verma P, Khan R, Upadhayay A.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Are RMGIC restorations as effective with or without selective caries removal in primary molars?

Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2021
Design A two-arm parallel group, tooth-randomised, controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.Case selection Participants were cooperative 3-9-year-old children of good health, presenting with at least one International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) Grade 5 cavitated dentine occlusal carious lesion, with radiographic depth into dentine.
Rebecca, Gibbison, Rebecca, Crozier
openaire   +2 more sources

Development of experimental resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) with reduced water uptake and dimensional change

Dental Materials, 2016
To investigate water uptake, desorption, diffusion coefficient, solubility and dimensional changes of four experimental RMGICs in deionized water (DW) and artificial saliva (AS), and compare with two commercial RMGICs and control home liquids based on the two commercial materials used.Two commercial RMGICs, RelyX Luting (RX, 3M ESPE) and Fuji Plus (FP,
Amani Agha, Sandra Parker, Mangala P. Patel   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Pulp response after application of two resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) in deep cavities of prepared human teeth

Dental Materials, 2011
This study evaluated the human pulp response to the application of two RMGICs in deep cavities in vivo.The cavity floor prepared on the buccal surface of 34 premolars was lined with VBP (VBP), Vitrebond (VB) or Dycal® (DY), and restored with composite resin. Additional teeth were used as an intact control group.
Souza Costa, Carlos A. de, Ribeiro, Ana Paula D., Aparecida Giro, Elisa M., Randall, Ros C., Hebling, Josimeri   +4 more
openaire   +3 more sources

RMGIC: Practical thoughts

BDJ In Practice, 2022
openaire   +1 more source

PENGARUH KONTAMINASI SALIVA TERHADAP KEBOCORAN MIKRO RESIN KOMPOSIT DAN RMGIC SEBAGAI BAHAN PIT DAN FISSURE SEALANT

2022
Pit dan fissure sealant merupakan salah satu upaya pencegahan karies secara sekunder. Proses isolasi yang kurang baik pada aplikasi pit dan fissure sealant dapat menyebabkan sealant terkontaminasi saliva. Sealant yang terkontaminasi dapat menyebabkan kebocoran mikro terjadi, dan mengakibatkan kegagalan perawatan pit dan fissure sealant.
openaire  

Systematic Reviewremineralizing Ability of Resin Modified Glass Ionomers (Rmgics): A Systematic Review

2023
James Ghilotti, Paula Mayorga, Jose Luis Sanz, Leopoldo Forner, Carmen Llena   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source