Results 151 to 160 of about 2,863 (189)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Evaluation of Schmidt Hammer Rebound Hardness Test Holders
Geotechnical Testing Journal, 1984Abstract An evaluation is made of three different holders for Schmidt hammer tests on rock core in the laboratory, including steel angle, V-notch, and semicircular groove holders. The differences are small, but it is shown that the V-notch holder gives consistently higher rebound hardness values.
KL Gunsallus, FH Kulhawy, TD O'Rourke
openaire +1 more source
Evaluation of Laboratory Schmidt Hammer Tests on Carbonate Rocks
Proceedings, 2013Being quick, inexpensive, non-destructive and handy, the Schmidt Hammer (SH) test has been widely used to determine hardness and to predict the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of rocks. However, a review of empirical equations recommended for determination of the USC of rocks based on the SH rebound number (N) suggests that one unique formula ...
H. Arman +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Schmidt-hammer exposure-age dating: a review of principles and practice
Earth-Science Reviews, 2022Stefan Winkler, John A Matthews
exaly
Using the Schmidt hammer on folds: An example from the Cantabrian Zone (NW Iberian Peninsula)
Journal of Structural Geology, 2022Hodei Uzkeda, Josep Poblet
exaly
A method for normalization of Schmidt hammer rebound values
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2004Aydin, A, Basu, A
openaire +3 more sources
The effect of Schmidt hammer type on uniaxial compressive strength prediction of rock
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Minings Sciences, 2007R M Göktan
exaly