Results 261 to 270 of about 39,168,154 (298)

Optimizing the Openness of Digital Scholarly Editions

openaire   +1 more source

Modelling a Digital Scholarly Edition for Genetic Criticism: A Rapprochement [PDF]

Variants: the Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship, 2016
This essay proposes a model of genetic criticism's complex research object (writing processes) to make it manageable and develop an editorial infrastructure that facilitates research into five aspects of genetic criticism: exogenesis, endogenesis, epigenesis, microgenesis and macrogenesis.
Dirk Van Hulle
exaly   +4 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Minimal Functionality for Digital Scholarly Editions

2018
In this paper, we are analysing the quality of use of digital scholarly editions (DSEs), via usability testing. We do a competitor analyses in which a small sample of target users is gathered in a usability lab, asked to answer research questions via different research tools, and finally to rate the experience.
Federico Caria, Brigitte Mathiak
openaire   +2 more sources

Theorizing the Digital Scholarly Edition

Literature Compass, 2010
Abstract The scholarly edition has traditionally been conceived of as hierarchically ordered downwards from a text, buffered and augmented by apparatuses as subordinate editorial paratexts. Of old, the paratexts used to stand in a hermeneutic relationship – broadly, a commentary relationship – to the edition text.
openaire   +1 more source

Digital Scholarly Editing in Practice

Scholarly editions in print have long been central to literary studies, produced according to well-established methodologies. In recent decades, digital scholarly editions have gained prominence, with some publishers digitising existing print editions and others creating born-digital resources.
Dan Barker, Nicholas Cronk, Glenn Roe
openaire   +1 more source

Project-based digital humanities and social, digital, and scholarly editions

Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2016
There appears an obvious fit between the application of ‘social media’ technologies to the making of scholarly editions in digital form and the markedly collaborative nature of the typical digital humanities project. Accordingly, it may be argued that the model of the collaborative project-based edition need only to be extended, to become ‘social ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Futures of Digital Scholarly Editing

rbm: a journal of rare books, manuscripts and cultural heritage
Stephanie P. Browner, Julia Flanders, Ed Folsom, Nicole Gray, Cassidy Holahan, Fotis Jannidis, Aylin Malcolm, Sarah Lynn Patterson, Elena Pierazzo, K.J. Rawson, Whitney Trettien, John Unsworth, Dirk Van Hulle, Robert Warrior, Marta L. Werner   +14 more
  +4 more sources

Annotation in Digital Scholarly Editions

Annotation in digital scholarly editions (of historical documents, literary works, letters, etc.) has long been recognized as an important desideratum, but has also proven to be an elusive ideal. In so far as annotation functionality is available, it is usually developed for a single edition and cannot easily be deployed elsewhere.
Boot, P., Haentjens Dekker, R.
openaire   +1 more source

Accessibility and inclusion in Digital Scholarly Editing

The contribution is about accessibility and inclusion of DSEs.
Anna Cappellotto, Raffaele Cioffi
openaire   +1 more source